Did you even read my post? Fred has 100% pro-life voting record and NARAL and other pro-choice groups hate him. You are ignoring the facts to promote your agenda. Ignoring facts does not make for a good argument....sorry.
“Did you even read my post? Fred has 100% pro-life voting record and NARAL and other pro-choice groups hate him. You are ignoring the facts to promote your agenda. Ignoring facts does not make for a good argument....sorry.”
Yes, I’ve read all of that and much more elsewhere. The bottom line is that he opposes a position that is near a dear to the heart of the moral base of the GOP. That is why it is in the party’s platform. He is hurting his chance of being nominated by continuing to straddle the fence in the name of federalism. Dedicated pro-lifers want abortion to end in all fifty states. It may be “pie in the sky” to want a constitutional ammendment, but there is a significant number in the GOP’s base that want this, even if the chances of it occuring are slim to none. For a candidate to take a position that is otherwise is perceived as a slap in the face; even if that is not the candidate’s intention.