Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HerrBlucher
As President, Thompson would appoint strict constructionist judges

Giuliani said the same thing, and it was B.S. coming from him too.

Somebody who doesn't think that innocent babies qualify as "persons" whose life is protected by the 14th amendment has no business appointing anyone to the supreme court.

120 posted on 11/04/2007 2:46:32 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe

Here is what a real pro-life candidate’s positions looks like from http://www.gohunter08.com/inner.asp?z=4

Right to Life Amendment
I would amend the U.S. Constitution and provide blanket protection to all unborn children from the moment of conception by prohibiting any state or federal law that denies the personhood of the unborn. Likewise, I have also introduced the Right to Life Act, which would legally define “personhood” as the moment of conception and, therefore, guarantee all constitutional rights and protections, including life, to the unborn without utilizing a constitutional amendment.

Philosophy of Judicial Appointments
I support people with good judgment, proven values, a belief in God, and a heart for the least of us, including the unborn. I believe it is important that those sitting on the bench understand that they have a responsibility to strictly interpret our nation’s laws and not legislate from the bench with their own political or social agenda. I will not appoint judges who do not believe that the unborn are precious and should be protected


139 posted on 11/04/2007 3:02:09 PM PST by upsdriver (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!! The steakiest steak in the race!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson