To: 49th
Sounds like a rehash of the evidence presented at the trial and the so-called DNA links sound bogus. The teens liked rock n’ roll, so that’s good enough for me.
2 posted on
11/04/2007 1:07:28 PM PST by
Krankor
(kROGER)
To: Krankor
Wow... If I tell you I like rap music, are you going to come after me? ;^)
3 posted on
11/04/2007 1:09:56 PM PST by
49th
(this space for rent)
To: Krankor
I think you’re in the wrong country.
6 posted on
11/04/2007 1:23:56 PM PST by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
To: Krankor
It's more likely they were killed by the folks belonging to the DNA who knew the victims than these random kids. You might be able to explain away the stepdad's DNA entangled in the knot but when you link his alibi to the crime scene as well, something's very wrong with this case.
Justice is blind, not perfect. If fatal errors of judgment were made, they should be corrected and the right parties brought to justice.
To: Krankor
Arkansas, May of 93.........alot going on during that time of Clintons first term in March, April and May of that year.
To: Krankor
“Sounds like a rehash of the evidence presented at the trial and the so-called DNA links sound bogus. The teens liked rock n roll, so thats good enough for me.” Actually, most pedophiles don’t like rock music. You sound like a better suspect than they do. Where were you when this happened?
25 posted on
11/05/2007 7:28:42 AM PST by
monday
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson