[Yo-Yo]

This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago. Either this guy doesn't know about the prior art, or he does know and is ripping off Dr. Holt's work

http://www.rife.de/radio-wave_cancer_therapy.html

[wideminded]

This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago.

They didn't have nanoparticles thirty years ago, or the means to control where they went in the body.

[maine-iac7]

it doesn't matter when it was invented/discovered to be incredibly effective - do you really think the AMA is going to let anything so effective and so much less expensive to dry up the lucrative field of cancer?

It wont happen until another illness is prevalent and it's treatment as expensive, comes along...

They remember what happened to all those careers, hospitals, etc, when TB and polio were licked....

[ETCM]

"This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago. Either this guy doesn't know about the prior art, or he does know and is ripping off Dr. Holt's work"

Actually, if you read both, they do not appear to be even remotely similar.

They did both get the same result, which is wide skepticism. Rightly so, IMHO.

[Nachum]

This technique was inveted by Dr. John Holt of Australia over thirty years ago.

Who cares? Any new light on defeating the menace of cancer is a good thing.