Yes, I noticed that as well. And although this certainly doesn't compare to Giuliani's incredible blunder with Bernard Kerick, it is something that calls into question the Thompson campaign's due diligence in vetting associates and donors.
So, are you saying that a campaign should not accept any money from anybody who has ever been found guilty of any crime?
Does that include civil offense, like speeding?
We MIGHT care about candidates, but unless the donor is a criminal NOW, or is raising money illegally FOR the campaign, what difference does it make if they did drugs 24 years ago?