I asked first. Like I said, typical for an evo. Always asking and never providing.
Awwwww, I'm so sorry! But you see, that's precisely the problem. You're using a religious framework to evaluate science, which doesn't work: scientists don't receive neat hundred-year chronologies on stone tablets. We have a great deal of evidence, but it looks very different.
You can't use religious arguments to critique science. But just the same, I can't use science to critique religion (unless you can somehow find a way to give me a testable claim, which I doubt you're clever enough to do).
You see, you're not just ignorant of science. You're also wrong on theological grounds -- and that's why I attack your theology with Augustine and Maimonides, not with Darwin or Gould.