Posted on 11/03/2007 7:11:47 PM PDT by Posting
ANALYSIS: Tensions Rise in Balkans
By DUSAN STOJANOVIC
BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Facing a possible loss of Kosovo, Serbian nationalists are re-igniting tensions in the Balkans, a region still reeling from brutal civil wars in the 1990s.
They're sending out dark hints about coming to the aid of their Serb brethren in neighboring Bosnia — a prospect that could unleash a new wave of ethnic violence.
Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica and his nationalist followers have launched a campaign against the international administrator for Bosnia, accusing him of seeking to dissolve the Serb mini-state carved out in a 1995 peace agreement.
The followers of late President Slobodan Milosevic have gone even further, saying that if Serbia's breakaway Kosovo province becomes independent, Serbia should respond by recognizing the Republika Srpska — the Bosnian Serb-controlled half of Bosnia.
"A referendum in Republika Srpska for its joining Serbia is inevitable," said Tomislav Nikolic, the leader of the increasingly powerful Serbian ultranationalists.
The bloody breakup of former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s — the worst carnage in Europe since World War II — started when the Serb-led Yugoslav army tried to prevent separatists in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo from seceding from the former federation.
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia — which had comprised former Yugoslavia — are now all independent countries. Tiny Montenegro was the last republic to secede from much larger Serbia in a referendum last year.
Kosovo formally remains part of Serbia, but has been run by the United Nations and NATO since the end of the 1999 war between ethnic Albanian separatists and Milosevic's forces.
Any attempt by Belgrade to win independence for the Bosnian Serbs would likely trigger renewed bloodshed in Bosnia, where an estimated 100,000 people died and millions were displaced in the 1992-95 war that pitted Bosnian Serbs against its Muslims and Croats.
Kosovo's fate is currently being negotiated at internationally brokered talks, which have been deadlocked because of the deeply opposing stands of Serbia, which wants to at least formally keep the province within its borders, and Kosovo's ethnic Albanian majority, which wants nothing short of independence.
If secessionist Kosovo Albanians declare independence as expected in December, Nikolic said Serbia must sever diplomatic ties with the West and impose an economic blockade on Kosovo.
Kostunica said proposals by Slovak administrator Miroslav Lajcak for strengthening Bosnia's joint, multiethnic parliament and other state bodies amounted to "the policies of force" seeking to alter the Dayton Peace Accords that ended the three-year bloodshed.
He said that "the preservation" of Kosovo and the Bosnian Serb mini-state are Serbia's "priority goals," and added that international policies in Bosnia and Kosovo were "jeopardizing essential interests of the Serb people."
Bosnian officials and Western powers, including the United States, Britain, France, Germany and Italy, have formally protested Kostunica's apparent attempts to link the fate of Kosovo with Bosnia.
Bosnia's Croat co-President Zeljko Komsic said that Kostunica's statements "finally reveal Belgrade's murky political games toward Bosnia." In unusually harsh language, Komsic said that Kostunica "should keep his hands off Bosnia, or his fingers and his nose could be broken."
Kostunica's spokesman Srdjan Djuric said Komsic's comments were "primitive and warmongering."
Slobodan Samardzic, a Serbian government minister, rejected Western protests over Serbia's meddling into Bosnia's affairs, saying that the issues of Kosovo and Bosnia were linked "regardless of the government policies."
"Anyone in the region would easily link the two," he said, as Kostunica added in a statement Thursday that proposals by Bosnia's international mediator could trigger "a serious crisis."
Lajcak said that his new rules are designed to prevent Bosnia's lawmakers and ministers from blocking reforms simply by not attending sessions of Parliament or government meetings. The new rules change the way a quorum is calculated by counting ministers and lawmakers who attend, rather than including those who do not.
Bosnia's Serbs have often blocked proposed laws by not attending meetings. In general, Bosnian Serbs have objected to the strengthening of Bosnia's central institutions, preferring instead to strengthen ties with neighboring Serbia.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon reiterated his support for Lajcak's measures and said in a statement that he "is concerned about recent political developments" in Bosnia.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iGLtZea-0vbt-LOorU8VZ6ie7vxgD8SLD9Q00
can someone reduce this to its essentials in plain english?
Typical AP lead-in. Of course those church-burning, Serb-murdering Muslim Albanians, who are determined to take Kosovo and add it to their conquests, have nothing to do with igniting tensions.
And the Albanians who were just caught stealing a bunch of Serb uniforms, hoping to fake up an incident, have nothing to do with increasing tensions either, I suppose.
AP loves Muslim terrorists of any kind.
Sure. This is Bill Clinton’s quagmire, Viet Nam, dismal failure.
Kosovo is only ethnically majority Albanian because they ran all of the Christians out of there and burned their Churches when the left the region.
Folks, whatever the UN touches turns to CaCa...is that so hard to understand?
To be short, Kosovo and the 1999 bombing campaign only came to an end when Milosevic agreed to stop fighting in exchange for a “guarantee” that Kosovo would remain a part of Serbia.
Gee, 8 yrs later, and the UN and the Euros are welching and allowing yet another Islamic Republic to be formed on the backs of Christian Serbs.
I am witchoo! “Who” and “what” don’t make any sense.
Used to be Who, what, when, where, and why.
It’s kind of like losing two of your five senses...
Liberals writing articles is the equivalent of Losing all sense!
What Biased- pro Islamist terrorist B.S. All the Serbs are doing is standing up for their right to not be wiped out - UN sponsored genocide- and have their land taken again by Islamic terrorists hell bent on regaining control of the entire region which was lost when the Serbs threw off the yoke around their necks after 200 years of brutality and slavery under the Islamic occupation. In the early 1900's, just after the fall of the Ottoman empire, the Serbs finally regained their freedom, and despite the attempt to wipe them out again during Hitlers riegn of terror by the Mufti of jerusalem and the Nazi SS division Hitler had placed in hi command, they persevered despite horrific losses.
Then Bil Clinton came along and bombed the hell out of Serbs, who were fighting against the Iranian sponsored Jihad (Islamic terrorism) against them. Now the UN want's to wipe the Serbs out completely- Genocide.
The Mohammadans once occupied Spain, is the UN going to do the same to Spain as they are doing to the Serbs?
Mufti of Australia: this was Muslim land
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/000920.php
We should remember that the UN is kidnapped by the Islamo Arab block.
Absolutely. Why else would places like Sudan be appointed as chair of the human rights commission, and people named "Mohammad" be responsible for "policing' Islamic countries for nuclear weapons development, and a whole host of other mind numbing idiocy. A lot of the NGO's within the Un are also full of Mohammadans, such as amnesty. Is it any wonder you don't hear Amnesty cry out about human rights, womens rights etc in Islamic countries?
The AP refuses to believe that Muslims can be the source of terrorism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.