Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: humblegunner

“We don’t get the best, we get the Party Nominee.

Then we vote for the nominee against Hillary.

That’s how it works. Did you know?”

You forgot one thing. The way that we get the party nominee is by voting for our choice. Your argument about the party nominee is sloppy and not well thought out. If we vote in the primary for who we want, we will get our nominee and that nominee will be the party nominee.

I am trying to figure out how some can say we can not vote for our choice when the primaries have not even begun yet. Not one vote has been cast and already there are many who think the primaries have been decided, or nearly decided. Then they try to tell others that they have to back the party nominee that does not exist at this point in time.

Not me. I am voting for who I think will do the best job and if enough of those who think this has already been decided stay home then I will get my nominee.

Who do you think will do the best job as President? Have you even thought about that or are you simply backing who you think will win? This is not a beauty contest.


165 posted on 11/05/2007 7:34:29 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom ("nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: mjaneangels@aolcom
I am voting for who I think will do the best job

We run into this every cycle.

When your guy Hunter turns out not to be the nominee, which he won't be,
will you be one of those who will start crying about "writing him in"
and basically throw your vote into the trash?

All that does is help the opposition.

170 posted on 11/06/2007 4:04:34 AM PST by humblegunner (My KungFu is ten times power.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson