Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B4Ranch
Final TB count: 1

This is the most misleading headline I have ever seen. While 212 tested positive, that only means that sometime in their life they were exposed to the TB virus. It does not mean that they had the disease or that they will develop the disease, only that they had been exposed.

13 posted on 11/03/2007 7:26:40 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Between the Lines

It is necessary to first be exposed to the disease before one “gets” it.

My grandmother, a nurse in a TB sanitarium in Wisconsin, died of the disease when my mother was 12.

This scourge had been eliminated, but apologists and rationalizers have carried the day.


14 posted on 11/03/2007 7:34:09 AM PDT by Bruce Buckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines
While 212 tested positive, that only means that sometime in their life they were exposed to the TB virus.

Nit. Tuberculosis is cause by a bacterium, not a virus.

16 posted on 11/03/2007 7:52:04 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines

>>About 10 percent of latent TB infections eventually become active TB disease, usually because of a compromised immune system.<<

That means that if you catch the flu and have latent TB infections, there is a good chance that the flu will develop into an active tuberculosis disease.


17 posted on 11/03/2007 7:55:14 AM PDT by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines
This is the most misleading headline I have ever seen. While 212 tested positive, that only means that sometime in their life they were exposed to the TB virus. It does not mean that they had the disease or that they will develop the disease, only that they had been exposed.

Read the 4th paragraph. The word latent means dormant. In other words the TB bacteria is just sitting in the exposed body waiting to activate. What triggers that activation is something that we don't know. Just hope you and family are not standing in line at Walmart when the TB bacterium of the exposed decides to activate.

33 posted on 11/03/2007 9:07:21 AM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines
While 212 tested positive, that only means that sometime in their life they were exposed to the TB virus.

About 10% of TB carriers develop active TB, so really the final TB count should be "21".

34 posted on 11/03/2007 9:12:14 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines
>>>This is the most misleading headline I have ever seen. <<<

Oh, I see. Care for another piece of chicken? It locally grown right near here in Decatur.

35 posted on 11/03/2007 9:32:37 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines

“Final TB count: 1”

Thanks for the dose of reality into the conversation. Unfortunately, no one seems to care about the facts. Especially the fact that only 1 person in the plant was contagious, and would only contaminate someone who actually came into contact with him.

They just go on talking about how the US is now a third world country. I don’t know if its my misperception, or whether it is getting harder and harder to find the truth in many of these threads.


65 posted on 11/03/2007 11:26:55 AM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines

"Final TB count: 1"

Actually, the article said that TWO employees had active TB, and that the results hadn't come back on the X-rays for the other employees who tested positive. The TWO active cases were the reason for company-wide testing.

Not to mention that a positive tuberculin test is NEVER a good thing. Active TB or not, you are talking about 212 people who have been exposed to TB, some of whom are going to develop active TB at some point if untreated. Is it something that we need to run screaming for the hills about? No. Is it an incredibly serious problem that needs to be addressed NOW? Absolutely.

TB has already regained a foothold in this country. The time to deal with is now, when only a handful have active TB. It will be a true disaster if TB once again becomes as widespread as it was, say, 100 years ago. We are on that path now, which is cause for alarm, although not yet for panic.

(New screen name, but I used to post here a couple years ago. Can't remember my old screen name to save my life.)
71 posted on 11/03/2007 1:01:59 PM PDT by zeegrindy ("I found my will and my desire impell'd by Love that moves the sun and other stars." -Dante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Between the Lines

I like your tagline. I assume you’re a Christian who is humble which is sometimes hard to find nowadays.


81 posted on 11/03/2007 4:14:07 PM PDT by ruthles (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson