Replies

I think you have clearly demonstrated your OPOSITION to Duncan Hunter over the past several weeks.

How so? I've made many very positive comments toward Duncan Hunter since last summer when I found out more about his record.

If you want to check the FACTS and sources on this please do so and get back to me with what you find.... and please stick to the facts...

The issue is what is in this "letter" and the merits of its statements. Don't try to deflect attention from it.

I'm not the issue here. This letter is.

I am not trying to deflect attention away from the original post. Which I did not write by the way, it was sent to me via private e-mail and I posted it. Seriously, if there is anything that in it that is NOT FACTUAL -- as you suggest.. I really do want to know about it. I have not personally researched this and took the post as "face value" because it came from someone that I trust.

I as not trying to deflect attention TOWARD you in any way.. I was simply stating that having reviewed some of your recent posts I don't see you as a "strong supporter of Duncan Hunter" so therefore when you post a comment like....YOUR WORDS IN RED

This is false

This is just silly and snarky. Hunter is demeaning himself, not Romney.

I take it with a "grain of salt" in view of the fact that you have not publicly stated your SUPPORT for Duncan Hunter.... as demonstrated by comments in previous posts...such as...

I like supporting RP (because I have for so long before he became so controversial) but I am prepared to let the primaries speak. If RP gets traction, great. If not, move on to my second choices. By that time (after SC), only two or three other candidates are likely to be viable and they will like be Rudi, Mitt, Fred. And I'll pick the guy most likely to beat Rudi in FL and elsewhere.