Replies

“I certainly don’t agree with Rudy G on everything, but fact is the abortion genie is never going back in the bottle. Homosexuality is now open, that’s not going to change either. Some level of gun control is gonna happen. Deal with these things.”

I don’t think you get it. The gay activists are not all about ensuring that they are tolerated. They are all about forcing you and everyone else positively to approve of their behavior. As long as anyone anywhere continues to say that their acts are disordered or immoral, that there’s something disordered about the inclination, that person has to be silenced. Actually it goes farther than that, that person must be made to affirm them in their behavior as perfectly normal. They will not stop short of that. They will first try to convince people who don’t care much one way or the other (like you, perhaps) that it’s “no big deal.” They’ve pretty much managed that already. Then they go after the hold-outs—the “social conservatives,” nearly all of them religiously conservative. These people are now the object of hate crime legislation and the sort of regulations (enforced by bureaucrats unaccountable to the voters) being passed in California that forbid you and me to refer to “mom and dad” families as if they were the norm.

Don’t you get it? This is not a matter of indifference. It will come around to bite all of us sooner or later and the bite has begun. Unless you positively affirm that Heather’s having two mommies is just as normal as Ozzie and Harriet, you are a criminal. That’s where it’s headed. And you tell us to “deal with it.” Get your head out of the sand and wake up.

And abortion likewise will come to bite you in the butt. Already a Northwestern University law professor has argued that, since it’s foolish to claim that the unborn child, even at the earliest stages, is not a human being, one has to admit that it has interests that conflict with the mother’s interests IF the mother didn’t want to be pregnant. It then becomes not an innocent but a guilty human being invading her privacy because she did not want it. By the right of self-defense, she may kill it. Moreover, because the state is obligated to help all of us defend ourselves, if the woman needs help from the state to kill the unwanted unborn child, she has a right to state help (state-funding). Notice that the only thing that turns an innocent human baby (a wanted pregnancy) into a guilty privacy-invading human baby is the woman’s sheer will to be pregnant or not to be pregnant. By that reasoning, my will alone can turn a person who’s “in my space” into a guilty offender whom I may legitimately kill, not because of some specific criminal act he may have done (breaking and entering) but just because I don’t like him, don’t want him in my space. Sort of in the way Hitler didn’t want Jews “in his space.”

Particularly the claim that state-funded abortion is a woman’s right by virtue of self-defense means that you can’t just sit idly by and think of abortion as “out there” for those who want to choose it. No, sooner or later you will be paying for it via your taxes, if the Julieannies and the Hillaries take power.

Finally, gun-grabbing is not just an indifferent thing out there that you can tell everyone to “deal with it.” When the hold-outs on homosexuality and abortion become small enough in number and have moved to relatively remote places to get away from the forced indoctrination and criminalization of their beliefs by schools and bureaucrats and governments, then the gay-green-choice choice fascists will surround them and crush them without a whimper because their guns have all been grabbed long ago.

Not that there’s anyway that we could defend ourselves over the long haul with the weapons available to us even if gun-grabbing laws were not on the books. But at least we could go down manfully. But no, the gun-grabbing laws Rudy loves will have long ago castrated us. All that will be left is to lie down and let the tanks roll over us.

Unless, of course, we don’t “just deal with it” but announce loud and long now, while there’s still time to avert a Julieannie nomination, that we won’t “just deal with it” but will oppose RudyGee and that he is unelectable because he is so out of touch with the base, because he “won’t just deal with” the fact that the grass-roots activism that created all of the Republican electoral victories of the past 30 years is pro-life, pro-heterosexual, and pro-gun-freedom.

No, Rudy’s the one who needs to “deal with it,” deal with us. So far all he’s done is jabbed his thumb in our eye to show how tough he is, tough especially in fishnets and high heals and lipstick.