Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpl

Based on this article his wife was innocent and he was guilty.


5 posted on 11/02/2007 12:33:55 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ZULU

She knew who and what her husband was. She might as well have driven the getaway car.


7 posted on 11/02/2007 12:45:31 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ZULU

I’m the co-author of the book The Rosenberg File, sometimes cited as the source for the notion that Ethel Rosenberg was innocent. Not so. Julius was the organizer of the spy ring. Ethel was aware of what he was doing and occasionally acted in an accessory role. At times, however, her help was very important — as when she talked her brother David Greenglass into contributing information about his work at Los Alamos.

It seems Ethel was also ready to volunteer for other tasks. Before the Soviets brought in Harry Gold as courier it was suggested in the Rosenbergs’ correspondence that Ethel would travel to New Mexico to pick up data.

There is no question that Ethel would have received a lesser sentence if Julius had confessed. Even in the absence of a confession, many observers — including J. Edgar Hoover — thought she should have been sentenced as an accomplice. But innocent she was not.


16 posted on 11/02/2007 1:09:57 PM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson