“Not that the quote is recent or anything, just that I’d understand better what gun you are talking about.”
I don’t care what you what you understand, you seem to have decided that the best way to take over a thread is to simply start posting long, wordy nonsense that doesn’t mean anything, but ties everyone one up with correcting your rambling, postings.
Romney regarding gun control:
Q: As governor you signed into law one of the toughest restrictions on assault weapons in the country.
Romney: Let’s get the record straight. First of all, there’s no question that I support 2nd Amendment rights, but I also support an assault weapon ban. Look, I’ve been governor in a pretty tough state. You’ve heard of blue states. In the toughest of blue states, I made the toughest decisions and did what was right for America. I have conservative values.
Source: 2007 Republican Debate in South Carolina May 15, 2007
Will support assault weapons bill and Brady Bill
The candidate reiterated his support for an assault weapons ban contained in Congress’ crime bill, and the Brady law which imposes a five-day waiting period on handgun purchases. `I don’t think (the waiting period) will have a massive effect on crime but I think it will have a positive effect,’ Romney said.
Source: Joe Battenfeld in Boston Herald Aug 1, 1994
I posted a 2-sentence response to a person who posted something that was totally wrong.
When someone then added a quote from Romney and said he was talking about a specific gun the guy owned for hunting, I asked him to include the part of the quote where Romney gave the name of the gun, to educate me.
I didn’t hijact the thread, someone else mentioned Romney first.
IF you are going to use a Fred thread to attack Romney, you are going to get Romney supporters DEFENDING Romney in your thread. I didnt’ say anything against Fred in that post, just corrected the statement about Romney.