[mysterio]

"Don’t play his flying airplanes game. He has been soundly trounced on that false example countless times."

Pffffft! In your dreams.

Ok. A plant grown on private property for personal use is grown on private property. Airspace is not private property. If you were talking about someone piloting an airplane on the ground on their own property, your example would be accurate. Your example is false however. And this has been pointed out to you countless times.

[robertpaulsen]

"If you were talking about someone piloting an airplane on the ground on their own property, your example would be accurate."

I'm talking about a private individual engaging in a non-commercial activity completely within his state. It is not commerce. It is not interstate.

Yet you and I agree that Congress (via the FAA) may regulate his activities if and when those activities have a substantial effect on the interstate commerce (commercial flights) that Congress is constitutionally regulating.

[Mojave]

Airspace is not private property.

Really? Property owners can't build above ground structures?

It must be nice to be able to simply invent your "facts" out of thin air.