I live in King County too and was shocked to my core to see the blatant vote fraud in 2004 as well as the aftermath trial, excuses and coverups.
Sharkansky (http://soundpolitics.com) is a genius when it comes to forensic investigations of vote fraud. But it is so absurd that the current state laws require that vote fraud be determined before the election (such as duplicate or false registrations) rather than after. Vote fraud detected after the election cannot invalidated, therefore blatant ballot stuffing, even if witnessed and taped cannot be invalidated once those false ballots are in the machines and counted.
Sound Politics is indeed a good site. On the face of it Prop. 1 might address that problem, but given the way the rats are allowed to "keep counting ballots (most of which mysteriously appear late in the counting) until they get the desired outcome" I worry that they will even be able to keep an "elected" Elections Commissioner in their pocket.
The Democrats have for decades made election fraud a time-honored tradition, and it seems that everybody knows it. Queen Christine literally succeeded at what Al Gore attempted, but failed to do. It was done right in our faces, and later rubbed in by a earring wearing Democrat judge.
Since Republicans are generally at the recieving end of this, I can't understand why Republicans don't make it a front burner issue. As of this morning (courtesy of Quinn in #25) I know of only one Republican who ever mentions it.
I can't for the life of me understand why our local rats are not wearing ACORN around their necks like an albatross.