Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
I didn't claim the gains were due to NAFTA.

You have before. Shall I post your comments and make you look like a fool?

You can't blame losses on NAFTA when there were net gains, can you?

The gains in manufacturing jobs were in the '93/94 era before Nafta was passed and right after before any person with common sense knows companies would not have had time to move to mehico. When nafta was in after a few years the maufacturing jobs started to show losses.

263 posted on 11/02/2007 9:37:22 AM PDT by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: am452
The gains in manufacturing jobs were in the '93/94 era before Nafta was passed and right after before any person with common sense knows companies would not have had time to move to mehico. When nafta was in after a few years the maufacturing jobs started to show losses.

Skip Navigation Links   Latest Numbers
DOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imageryý copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
 www.bls.gov  Advanced Search | A-Z Index
Change Output Options: From:   To:     
include graphs NEW!
Data extracted on: November 2, 2007 (12:41:17 PM)
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)

Series Id:     CES3000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector:  Manufacturing
Industry:      Manufacturing
NAICS Code:    N/A
Data Type:     ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1991 17329 17214 17141 17093 17069 17042 17016 17025 17011 16997 16960 16916  
1992 16839 16831 16805 16830 16834 16825 16822 16782 16762 16750 16758 16768  
1993 16790 16806 16795 16771 16766 16742 16742 16741 16768 16778 16800 16815  
1994 16853 16862 16896 16932 16962 17011 17027 17082 17114 17144 17187 17218  
1995 17259 17264 17263 17278 17260 17250 17218 17241 17246 17215 17207 17230  
1996 17206 17229 17192 17204 17221 17226 17222 17255 17253 17268 17276 17285  
1997 17298 17316 17339 17351 17362 17387 17387 17451 17466 17513 17555 17587  
1998 17621 17627 17637 17636 17624 17607 17421 17564 17558 17512 17466 17449  
1999 17426 17394 17368 17342 17333 17294 17319 17288 17281 17275 17283 17277  
2000 17285 17285 17302 17299 17276 17297 17325 17287 17232 17215 17204 17181  

 

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Postal Square Building
2 Massachusetts Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20212-0001

Phone: (202) 691-5200
Do you have a Data question?
Do you have a Technical (web) question?
Do you have Other comments?

LOL!

265 posted on 11/02/2007 9:42:29 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: am452

The gains in manufacturing jobs were in the ‘93/94 era when the economy was recovering from the recession and companies were rehiring before Nafta was passed and right after before any person with common sense knows companies would not have had time to move to mehico. When nafta was implemented the job losses started to show up several years after.


266 posted on 11/02/2007 9:43:55 AM PDT by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson