Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sinking Currency, Sinking Country
World Net Daily ^ | 11/02/07 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 11/02/2007 5:23:12 AM PDT by Thorin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621 next last
To: hedgetrimmer

Try reading posts 46, 98 and 119 and learning something about the Economy for a change.


141 posted on 11/02/2007 7:37:42 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Pacifism is not moral. True morality requires evil be opposed, not appeased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; MNJohnnie
American companies were relocating to Japan in the 1980s and giving half of their offshore holdings to the Japanese government, like they do for the communist chinese government today? LOL I didn't know that?!

Good point.

142 posted on 11/02/2007 7:39:34 AM PDT by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Really? Where does one find out the export profile of a Third World nation?

It exports raw materials and ag. commodities such as sugar, coffee, bananas (as in banana republic) and imports manufactured goods. Surely you know that. You can't possibly be such an ignoramus
143 posted on 11/02/2007 7:39:39 AM PDT by dennisw (Four and a half acres of sovereign U.S. territory,anytime,anywhere ---- US aircraft carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Common knowledge sir. If you want to sell a lot of a product to a country, you are going to have to give them a piece of the pie.

If it is common knowledge, there sure are alot of dumb people on this thread. They don't have a clue as to what China is doing. They just spout off thinking someone will believe them.

144 posted on 11/02/2007 7:40:12 AM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

You are still getting it wrong. Only a portion of the EU-15 member countries are running a trade surplus.


145 posted on 11/02/2007 7:40:18 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

EU-13?


146 posted on 11/02/2007 7:41:41 AM PDT by dennisw (Four and a half acres of sovereign U.S. territory,anytime,anywhere ---- US aircraft carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
It exports raw materials and ag. commodities such as sugar, coffee, bananas

Then I guess the exports in post #88 prove that we don't have the export profile of a Third World nation. Thanks for clearing that up.

147 posted on 11/02/2007 7:42:17 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Common knowledge sir. If you want to sell a lot of a product to a country, you are going to have to give them a piece of the pie.

When is China going to start building their manufacturing plants in the US??

148 posted on 11/02/2007 7:42:26 AM PDT by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I don’t know who your last post was directed to. I have never made any such statements about China’s economy, and in fact on a number of occasions here on FreeRepublic I have made the exact same statement you’ve made here.


149 posted on 11/02/2007 7:42:37 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Don't you think it would be rather foolish for the U.S. not to export ag-products? We have the most efficient (despite its own faults) ag sector on the planet.
150 posted on 11/02/2007 7:43:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
I think this is what's stumping me - take the semiconductor export number for instance. I assume that's the finished product but I believe that most of the assembly and test stages are done offshore. What this says to me is that the company is based here in the US but they either offshore or subcontract most of the work that would be blue collar here to lower paying countries (I think Asia in this case).

I could definitely be wrong, but ten years out why would Asia need the US based company if they do most of the grunt work anyway?

It's like IT -- tons of companies outsource/offshore the technical component to the detriment of the US IT worker... resulting in a big loss of IT degrees here in the US for the future. Pretty soon it's a lost skill here and we rely on other countries to do that work since we can't do it ourselves.

I can see both sides of the 'flat world' equation but I am definitely unsettled about the future of the US worker in many skilled fields.

Glad my daughter is going for a nursing degree, son is a bit too young to decide but I hope he goes for a career in something that cannot be sent to another country.

151 posted on 11/02/2007 7:45:15 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

EU-BS.


152 posted on 11/02/2007 7:45:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Even the EU25 runs a small trade deficit of 16 billion Euros. Compare that to our trade deficit in the 800 billion dollar range

If you run an insane trade deficit your currency gets spanked. Such as today the USD is down and gold mine stocks up so far


153 posted on 11/02/2007 7:46:37 AM PDT by dennisw (Four and a half acres of sovereign U.S. territory,anytime,anywhere ---- US aircraft carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
>>>>Oh, we have things to export but nothing like we did 10-20-30 years ago. Entire industries have been decimated. The factories are gone and abandoned to rust and rats

>>>>You can lower the US dollar by 50% and we'll have trouble evening up the trade deficit.

You are exactly right.

154 posted on 11/02/2007 7:47:48 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

... we shouldn’t tax the imports but we should inspect them 100% and have the importers pay for 100% of the inspection costs (not out of OUR tax dollars).

The falling dollar would only make us more competitive in the world if we were energy independent. Because 60% of our trade deficit is related to energy imports, and because energy imports become more expensive as the dollar decreases in value, the dollar decrease just means that the % of the trade deficit that is due to energy will increase. WE ARE SENDING MORE $$$ TO THE PEOPLE THAT HATE US!!

And OPEC and China will continue to sponsor the enviro-whackos so that we will never become energy independent.


155 posted on 11/02/2007 7:48:20 AM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: american colleen

I did some research on the semiconductor sector a couple years ago. At the time, our largest plants were Intel’s in Flagstaff and Samsung’s in Austin. Both were undergoing multi-billion dollar expansions.


156 posted on 11/02/2007 7:48:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Don't you think it would be rather foolish for the U.S. not to export ag-products? We have the most efficient (despite its own faults) ag sector on the planet.

We have a great and modern ag sector. These are great exports same as Australia which also exports wheat

I will definitely admit this is much better than the coffee sugar bananas exports of a 3rd world nation

But still, the mark of an advanced nation is you make your big money foreign exchange by exporting manufactured goods. Like Japan, Korea, Germany

157 posted on 11/02/2007 7:51:26 AM PDT by dennisw (Four and a half acres of sovereign U.S. territory,anytime,anywhere ---- US aircraft carrier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK

The Outstanding Public Debt as of 02 Nov 2007 at 02:49:13 PM GMT is:

$ 9,081,537,254,554.48

The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.44 billion per day since September 29, 2006

Once again it is the total debt we must focus on, not just what is accrued per quarter.

158 posted on 11/02/2007 7:51:42 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Bump to that!


159 posted on 11/02/2007 7:52:20 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

You do understand that if I cherry-picked my data, say, by including Canada’s and Mexico’s figures with those of the United States (such as you are using EU figures), even without using the term “small,” our domestic tinfoil manufacturs would not be able to keep up with the surge in demand.


160 posted on 11/02/2007 7:53:20 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson