I want you to prove to me that you understand the math and the consequences of the calculations. Without that understanding you are not in a position to discern accuracy from propaganda.
Show me the numbers. Not a link, nor a group of links. I want you to explain it to me in your own words.
Do the same for information.
I suspect you haven’t a clue about either abiogenesis or information. I also suspect you haven’t a clue about probability.
Prove me wrong.
Sure Bsharp right after you explain to my why a chance of 10 to hte 350’th plus power is concider all that is needed for trillions of ever increasingly complex mutational advances? When you do that then we’ll discuss what you like-The Wistar Symposium laid it out just fine- go and seek ye the truth. It was NOT a symposium of ID proponents, it was NOT a symposium of anti-evolutionists- it was a symposium of the toip scientists coming ot hte very logical conclusion that descent with modification is entirely impossible- As I said- NO- I’ve supplied you and others with thel inks many many itmes in the past, and All I get for hte efforts are foot stomping insistances that ‘it could happen because it isn’t absolutely impossible’ and get the same lame demands from folk like you time and itme again when new threads pop up- Not this time JS- You can belittle and malign all you like- it does NOTHING to make Macroevolution either a biological possibility OR a mathematical possibility.
Google wistar or don’t- I don’t care