Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
Human Events ^ | 08/16/2006 | Frances Rice

Posted on 11/01/2007 6:04:11 AM PDT by coffee260

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: darkangel82

I wonder if MLK ever spoke out against the oppression of Black Cubans under Fidel (I’m guessin’ he didn’t). Batista was a Black Cuban.


81 posted on 11/01/2007 2:58:44 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I don’t see how you can read those speeches and positions and not recognize he was clearly Socialist.

Lincoln has been called the first communist by people that don't understand how he wanted to ensure equality.

Show me one socialist country where the poor don't work and yet are paid a wage (which during MLK time) would put them on an equal footing with the middle class for doing nothing?

Even the worst forms of socialism aren't based on such stupidity as you are desperately trying to read into what King said.

82 posted on 11/01/2007 3:01:37 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
It is impossible to create a formula for the future which does not take into account that our society has been doing something special against the Negro for hundreds of years. How then can he be absorbed into the mainstream of American life if we do not do something special for him now, in order to balance the equation and equip him to compete on a just and equal basis? ...

Few people consider the fact that, in addition to being enslaved for two centuries, the Negro was, during all those years, robbed of the wages of his toil. No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries. Not all the wealth of this affluent society could meet the bill. Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. ...

Justice for black people will not flow into society merely from court decisions nor from fountains of political oratory. Nor will a few token change quell all the tempestuous yearning of millions of disadvantaged black people. White America must recognize that justice for black people cannot be achieved without radical changes in the structure of our society. The comfortable, the entrenched, the privileged cannot continue to tremble at the prospect of change in the status quo. When millions of people have been cheated for centuries, restitution is a costly process. Inferior education, poor housing, unemployment, inadequate health care--each is a bitter component of the oppression that has been our heritage. Each will require billions of dollars to correct. Justice so long deferred has accumulated interest and its cost for this society will be substantial in financial as well as human terms. - Martin Luther King, Jr., Why We Can’t Wait, 1964


83 posted on 11/01/2007 3:05:18 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

“Desperately trying to read into” ? C’mon, man, now you’re just trolling. You’re reminding me of the dead parrot skit from Monty Python.


84 posted on 11/01/2007 3:05:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
Technically speaking, they're right. But I don't think the campaign is going to do any good.

How we would have voted if it were 50 or 100 years ago and how long dead people would vote now are at best parlor games.

What matters is getting things right in the present.

85 posted on 11/01/2007 3:08:51 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
From what I read, Junior was largely “unaffiliated” prior to ‘60 (though his father was registered Republican). Although Northern Blacks had largely become Democrats by the mid ‘30s (partly due to FDR, and also due to the fact that many Northern cities were becoming controlled by Democrats, so in order to “get anywhere”, you had to become one), most Southern Blacks were still solidly Republican (although largely prevented from exercising their right to vote) until 1964. It was simply unthinkable for a Black person to be a Democrat in the South, for obvious reasons.

One less-obvious reason was that many Southern states had "white primaries" under the legal theory that the parties were private organizations, and could restrict their membership as they pleased. Since Republicans rarely won anything in the Democrats' "solid South," the primary was the race that mattered, and black votes were rendered more or less irrelevant.

The supreme court banned white primaries in 1944, but I don't know how long it took the states to comply.

86 posted on 11/01/2007 4:11:26 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; fieldmarshaldj
It is impossible to create a formula for the future which does not take into account that our society has been doing something special against the Negro for hundreds of years. How then can he be absorbed into the mainstream of American life if we do not do something special for him now, in order to balance the equation and equip him to compete on a just and equal basis? ...

Few people consider the fact that, in addition to being enslaved for two centuries, the Negro was, during all those years, robbed of the wages of his toil. No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries. Not all the wealth of this affluent society could meet the bill. Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. ...

Justice for black people will not flow into society merely from court decisions nor from fountains of political oratory. Nor will a few token change quell all the tempestuous yearning of millions of disadvantaged black people. White America must recognize that justice for black people cannot be achieved without radical changes in the structure of our society. The comfortable, the entrenched, the privileged cannot continue to tremble at the prospect of change in the status quo. When millions of people have been cheated for centuries, restitution is a costly process. Inferior education, poor housing, unemployment, inadequate health care--each is a bitter component of the oppression that has been our heritage. Each will require billions of dollars to correct. Justice so long deferred has accumulated interest and its cost for this society will be substantial in financial as well as human terms. - Martin Luther King, Jr., Why We Can’t Wait, 1964

And who was he talking about that did all those things to black people....The Democrats!

Every attempt by the republicans to make things equal in this country for those that suffered under the abuses of the democrat party has been subverted by the democrats, welfare, affirmative action,the war on poverty civil rights all subverted and perverted to becomes tools for the democrats continuing to subjugate a whole race of people.

Hasn't this party always been the one that wanted all our citizens to be treated as equals under the law? Isn't that what Dr. King was asking for as well?

Maybe I'm the only one here that remembers how brutal and vile blacks were treated by democrats in the south, or how republicans stood up to them and stood beside Dr. King when Democrats were willing to use force against people asking for what our constitution guaranteed them as citizens.

Maybe I am the only one that remember how Mexicans were treated better then blacks in the south, or how a black man couldn't ask a decent wage without risking their jobs or in some cases their lives.

If it is socialism to want equality for all our citizens, doesn't that make The Republican party the true socialists in this nation?

There is more to socialism then asking for a decent wage, civil rights, or respect as a man or a woman, and neither of you have shown me enough to make me say the man wasn't a republican, if anything you have shown that he embodied the ideas that have been the hallmark of this party and the antithesis of what the democrats have proven they believe in.

87 posted on 11/01/2007 5:23:38 PM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

Are you seriously endorsing Marxist economics as a logical and workable solution to 400 years of oppression ?


88 posted on 11/01/2007 5:37:37 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Democrats won the black vote by throwing money at them and it worked.


89 posted on 11/01/2007 5:53:09 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
King was saying that there hasn't been enough welfare, not enough handouts, not enough redistribution of wealth, not enough socialism. Leftists always think the answer to the failures of socialism is more socialism! Equality under the law is not the same thing as equality of wealth!

King wanted the minimum yearly wage to be the same as the median income! That doesn't even make sense, because the median income would drastically increase if the minimum wage was increased to equal the median income! The only way the minimum yearly income would equal the median yearly income would be if everyone in the country made the exact same wage! That doesn't sound like socialism to you? The median income in the US in 2006 was over $32,000. Do you think it would be a good idea to raise the minimum wage to $16 an hour!?

90 posted on 11/01/2007 6:31:33 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
Most blacks I talk to don't know, there was a real Martin Luther, M. L. King changed his name after him, a White German. Without knowing about Martin Luther, you will not understand Martin Luther King.

ca.1500
91 posted on 11/01/2007 6:58:08 PM PDT by modican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

I’m not real proud of the fact that he was a Republican. Marxists have no place in the GOP.


92 posted on 11/01/2007 7:07:14 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

For interested Freepers..MLK WAS a Republican!

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1919430/posts


93 posted on 11/21/2007 7:09:00 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson