Also, the woman was the victim of rape, but the crime is against the state. It does not matter if the victim was a hooker. Non-consensual sex is a crime. If a hooker withdraws her consent, then it’s rape and the perpetrators have committed a crime against the state. If people want to get stupid enough to follow this ‘theft of service arguement’, then the hooker needs to go to civil court for damages. But the criminal offense is against the state, not the woman. The judge, like most of the sick, vile posters on this thread, was off her rocker and should be disbarred.
HAVE I EVER ONCE SAID THE WOMAN WAS *NOT* A RAPE VICTIM!?!?!?
YES~!~!~!~ SHE *WAS* RAPED AND THE PERPS SHOULD FRY FOR IT *IS* *THAT* *CLEAR* *ENOUGH*??????
YOU AND RED IN BLUE PA HAVE A SELECTIVE HEARING PROBLEM
AND NO ONE HAS ANSWERED MY SINGLE QUESTION: IF THEY PAID HER AFTERWARDS- THEN WHAT??? NO CRIME EXCEPT PROSTITUTION
(geez I am grumpy before my morning coffee....)