Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iowa Granny; Ladysmith; Diana in Wisconsin; JLO; sergeantdave; damncat; phantomworker; joesnuffy; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this Upper Midwest/outdoors/rural list please FR mail me. And ping me is you see articles of interest.

As usual, someone on FR will probably know, but this doesn't smell right to me. I was under the impression that the databases were already connected, and that a felon could no more buy a license than someone who hadn't attended hunting school. Maybe that's only when they set up the initial account with the DNR.

The more serious crime is firearm possession, not the license purchase, if this really is a problem the state can take $500m from somewhere else.

The complete article, turns out I didn't need to excerpt.

At least 77 felons bought Wisconsin deer hunting licenses last year even though it’s illegal for them to ever have guns.

The actual number is probably a lot higher.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel says only one in five hunters allow their names to be released, which means the paper could only check the criminal records of a relative few.

The Department of Natural Resources picks up few of those felons. Only about 20 were caught last year.

At least 600 felons were documented to buy sporting licenses, which may or may not involve the use of guns.

It’s not against the law for felons to get gun-deer licenses, but it is a crime to use them.

Armed robbers and rapists were among those in the woods last year, creating possible tension and maybe violence.

Rep. Terry Musser, R-Black River Falls, agrees. He says he’ll introduce a bill next month to require criminal background checks for the hundreds of thousands who buy deer licenses.

A similar effort failed six years ago when the DNR said it would have cost a half-million dollars just to upgrade the necessary computers.

6 posted on 10/31/2007 4:52:20 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

he’ll introduce a bill next month to require criminal background checks for the hundreds of thousands who buy deer licenses.

Why stop there?
There certainly must be criminal fisherman too!
/x


11 posted on 10/31/2007 4:55:26 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
They have it backwards. I could understand them revoking the privilege of hunting, not the right of owning a gun. Thats for another thread.
14 posted on 10/31/2007 4:59:42 PM PDT by BGHater (Lead. The MSG for the 21st Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
...rapists were among those in the woods last year, creating possible tension and maybe violence.

not to mention, ruining the meat.

30 posted on 10/31/2007 5:59:28 PM PDT by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson