To: Petronski
I hadn’t realized that Romney originally spoke out in favor of the Bush “comprehensive immigration reform” plan.
How can Romney rationalize being for the original version but against the final version? The original version of that dead duck plan was actually even worse than the stinker that ultimately and thankfully was voted down. ???
17 posted on
10/31/2007 2:00:57 PM PDT by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: ellery
He doesn't have to rationalize anything. His army of supporters just believe!
18 posted on
10/31/2007 2:02:08 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: ellery
I hadn’t realized that Romney originally spoke out in favor of the Bush “comprehensive immigration reform” plan. You hadn't realized it because it is a distortion. It would be like calling Fred Thompson pro-abortion because of the comments he made in 1994 reported in a newspaper that could be twisted to infer that. Both lines of attack are equally without merit.
32 posted on
10/31/2007 7:21:17 PM PDT by
WOSG
(Pro-life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-national sovereignty, pro-strong national defense, PRO-troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson