"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Or, it’s a Republican and they’re waiting till election eve.
Right, can’t be a Republican or Hillary. Can’t be Obama so that narrows the field of suspects. Hillary’s media is so transparent.
No. If it were a dem, it would be out by now so the dems don't nominate someone who will take a hit after the nomination or so that the information is "old hat" long before the election. That they are sitting on it means it's an R. They are hoping he gets the nomination and then the story "leaks out" anyway close to the election. All the time, the Old Media company protests it was worried about the ethics so it sat on the story.
It's the way they handled the Foley scandal, when the target was an R. It sat and sat and, amazingly, just before the election, a leftist operative gets the info and springs it.
OTOH, releasing the info early is how they handled the info when the target was a D. Remember Jennifer Flowers? By the election it was "old news."
Exactly!
That’s the read I’m getting. There would be no ethics consideration if it was a Republican.
Not necessarily. They could be holding it until after someone starts to stand out among the Republicans. If it’s the person in question then they would play their scandal card to destroy him.
Gotta be John Edwards. Already rumors around about him.
They must mean Democrat or they wouldn’t sit on the story.
Hillary? drugging and raping now?