Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cross-dressing state lawmaker blackmailed following late night tryst
KXLY News ^ | 10-30-07

Posted on 10/31/2007 5:25:14 AM PDT by bshomoic

Cross-dressing state lawmaker blackmailed following late night tryst

Rob Kauder / Internet Content Manager, KXLY.com

Last updated: Tuesday, October 30th, 2007 06:57:17 PM

SPOKANE -- State Representative Richard Curtis says he's not gay, but police reports and court records indicate the Republican lawmaker from southwestern Washington dressed up in women's lingerie and met a Medical Lake man in a local erotic video store which led to consensual sex at a downtown hotel and a threat to expose Curtis' activities publicly.

A search warrant unsealed Tuesday morning disclosed that State Representative Richard Curtis (R - La Center) had sex in his room at the Davenport Tower with a man identified as Cody Castagna, 26, of Medical Lake, who he met at the Hollywood Erotic Boutique on October 26th.

Curtis, according to a search warrant unsealed Tuesday, went to the Hollywood Erotic Boutique on East Sprague on October 26th at approximately 12:45 a.m. The store clerk, who had talked with Curtis, referred to him as "The Cross-Dresser" and said that during their conversations he confirmed he was gay and was married with children at home.

During his visit to the video store Curtis was observed wearing women's lingerie while receiving oral sex from an unidentified man in one of the movie viewing booths inside the store.

Afterward he met Cody Castagna, and they talked about getting together at Curtis' hotel room to have sex. Curtis left Castagna his cellphone number and went to Northern Quest Casino and receiving a call from him around 3 a.m., and planned to get together at the hotel a short while later.

The two met at the Davenport Tower around 3:34 a.m. and police reports confirm Curtis and Castagna had anal intercourse after which Curtis fell asleep. Castagna, according to court records, then allegedly took Curtis' wallet out of his jacket pocket and left the room.

Around 7 a.m. he called Curtis and told him he knew he was a member of the Washington State House of Representatives and was married, that he had taken pictures of Curtis with a camera on his cellphone and he offered to return the wallet in exchange for $1,000. In police reports it is claimed that Curtis offered Castagna that sum of money in exchange for having unprotected anal intercourse.

Curtis, during an interview with a Spokane detective, claimed that he gave Castagna $100 for "gas money" and insisted that the money was not payment for sex. During that phone conversation he claimed he only had $200 and left the money in an envelope at the front desk at the Davenport Tower for Castagna in exchange for the return of his wallet.

The attempt to get his wallet back proved unsuccessful as Castagna called Curtis back later on the 26th and demanded the remaining $800 from him. Unbeknownst to Castagna at the time Curtis had already contacted Spokane police and a detective was present with Curtis when Castagna called again.

When he contacted police, Curtis told detectives he wanted to keep the incident quiet and didn't want to press charges against Castagna and that all he wanted was his wallet back.

During the call Castagna not only demanded $800 for the return of Curtis' wallet but also said the money would buy his silence, implying that without the money he would expose Curtis' gay lifestyle to his wife. Curtis admitted to police that if details of the incident became public he would have to tell his wife and would need to hire a divorce attorney.

Following the phone call arranging for the return of the wallet police officers set up surveillance of the location where Curtis' billfold was to be dropped and subsequently recovered it.

Castagna offered a completely different view of the events that happened on October 26th in several interviews with detectives. Castagna claimed that Curtis had met him at the Hollywood Erotic Boutique and later at Curtis' hotel room offered him $1,000 in exchange for sex, adding that while he was in Curtis' room at the Davenport Tower Curtis rented two XXX-rated gay movies for the two to watch. After the two had sex, Castagna claimed that Curtis gave him his wallet as collateral to hold on to until he gave him the remainder of the $1,000.

He also admitted to detectives he had threatening to publicly expose Curtis to his wife.

According to his personal page on MySpace.com early Tuesday morning, Castagna claims he's a 26-year-old Wyoming native now living in Medical Lake and working locally as a server. His MySpace page has since been set to private.

The Columbian newspaper in southwestern Washington where Rep. Curtis lives confirmed that Castagna has faced multiple charges in juvenile court in Spokane and King County involving assault, theft, burglary and malicious mischief and that in 2001 he pled guilty to a forgery charge as an adult and was sentenced to two months in jail followed by a year in community custody.

Aside from his statements to the police, Rep. Curtis' only public statement about the incident on October 26th was to The Columbian. He told the newspaper Monday he did not solicit anyone for sex, that he is not gay and that he got into this mess just trying to help someone out.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: curtis; richardcurtis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Mr. Jeeves

That’s true. I would not be surprised if Dan Abrams or Larry King will have the blackmailer or whatever on their show. They seems to get something out of perverted sex stories.


41 posted on 10/31/2007 7:48:18 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic; martin_fierro; aculeus; dighton; Lijahsbubbe
He also admitted to detectives he had threatening to publicly expose Curtis to his wife.

This is all very confusing!

42 posted on 10/31/2007 7:50:11 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I can not understand how anybody can be for the planned murder of the most innocent.

I will never vote or give any support to anyone who is not totally against this sick, evil side of America.
That includes anybody who will compromise with this evil.

43 posted on 10/31/2007 7:54:12 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Yeah, that little detail tends to be left out when it’s a Democrat....you usually have to go Googling around to find out then.


44 posted on 10/31/2007 8:21:15 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
Only the gay heterosexuals.

****************

LOL! Exactly.

45 posted on 11/01/2007 5:32:08 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic
Police report (PDF)

He's resigned

Letter of resignation (PDF)
46 posted on 11/01/2007 6:42:02 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sal
Also, for what it's worth (I don't pretend to have inside info), I think the Craig thing WAS a set up, but it was a set up of a guilty guy and it was planned for a lot later.

In order for this to have been a "setup" you would have to know he was going to do that .. which bathroom he would use .. and the security detail at the airport would have to be in on it too. Assuming they conspired to do all of that .. how did they make Craig go into the ONE appropriate men's room, start tapping his foot and reaching under the stall? No, I'm not buying into the "setup" theory.

For me, it seems a whole lot more likely that Craig just got careless .. and when caught, he was too arrogant to admit he couldn't handle the situation. If he had used his head he would have said NOTHING, and would have immediately contacted an attorney. But oh no .. he thought he could handle this because he is a big shot Senator. No, I don't believe Craig was "set up" .. Craig did this to himself.

47 posted on 11/01/2007 9:48:26 AM PDT by CometBaby (You can twist perceptions .. reality won't budge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
Craig is arrogant and lied about resigning. But this was no set-up. Craig did it all to himself.
48 posted on 11/01/2007 10:02:32 AM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby; Jane Austen
I totally agree that Craig did it to himself, and I believe he's been doing it for quite a while. One of the newspapers from his home state has been reporting the rumors of his conduct for many years and has been regarded as out to get Craig by Craig supporters. IOW lots of people knew or suspected.

Remember the MO of CREW getting "something" on Foley. A family linked to that group had a son who was a page and he had been sending FOLEY provocative text messages/emails and he shared Foley's answers with a bunch of other "vulnerable" pages who ridiculed Foley behind his back.

During the exhibition many "witness" pages became informed of what Foley was like and were therefore prepped for making statements when the trigger was pulled right before the election. IOW CREW went to the trouble to set up disaster for Foley (who deserved it) and all Republicans a very long time before they sprung the exposure trap. They had an agent provocateur and a gaggle of support cast. They worked hard at it and they are not the only investigative group working for the Clinton War Room.

The Clintons have used regular PI businesses in the past. One of them, Palladino, was in jail last time I heard. Way back they were working at compromising pubbies on financial matters. I remember watching a Senate hearing where Terry Lenzner let it slip that he had investigated Senator Nichols and his family over Indian reservation support. I remember Nichols saying in a stunned voice, "You investigated my family?! Apparently he didn't get anything on them, but it gives insight into the lengths they go to (and pay for) to get something on somebody.

WRT Craig that airport is one of the usual lay overs on Craig's way home which would be known to anyone trying to get something to use against him--IOW a tracker would know which police records to routinely check for complaints or arrests in a limited time frame via LexisNexis based on where Craig was and in an environment where he would hope to be anonymous. (One little clerk in the PI or CREW office sitting at a computer routinely checking police reports, financial records, anything that could be useful. Not difficult even if the cop did NOT tip somebody off. Also, that specific bathroom in that specific airport was well known to be a trolling ground, hence the cop running the sting.

IMO the cop knew he didn't have enough on Craig to hold up in court, but he also knew Craig didn't need any support for the long term rumors and promised "it wouldn't need to get out" if Craig pleaded to the lesser charge which we know he did. We know that it didn't "get out" for months. Then, all of a sudden, just when Hillary needed a news diversion from Hsu, it DID get out. I believe it was supposed to get out later--at election time.

49 posted on 11/02/2007 10:59:36 AM PDT by Sal (Is Senator Kyl trying to rehab himself from Grand Betrayer status? I hope so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson