To: jimboster
It’s Edwards, verifiably.
Google around. Late September the Enquirer picked it up.
To: SteveMcKing
No, they specifically say it’s not the Edwards’ adultery scandal
17 posted on
10/30/2007 6:15:44 PM PDT by
jimboster
(fROM)
To: SteveMcKing
To: SteveMcKing
From the article: "By the way, it’s not the Edwards rumor, it’s something else.
34 posted on
10/30/2007 6:19:47 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
To: SteveMcKing
Anyone hear anything yet? I looked around, not a single thing...like to post it on my site if I do find out. But then, I have to know for sure that it is true.
Gary
35 posted on
10/30/2007 6:20:07 PM PDT by
GaryLee1990
(www.WatchingHillary.com)
To: SteveMcKing
It’s Edwards, verifiably No scandal there. Just auditioning replacements for whenever Liz takes the dirt nap.
277 posted on
10/31/2007 5:26:16 AM PDT by
TheRightGuy
(ERROR CODE 018974523: Random Tagline Compiler Failure)
To: SteveMcKing
From the article:
“By the way, t’s not the Edwards rumor, it’s something else. “
334 posted on
10/31/2007 7:40:32 AM PDT by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: SteveMcKing
Exactly. Nothing like coming off as a guy who is cheating on his terminally ill wife.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson