[Enchante]

"I'm betting it's Obama"

That would seem to be the best bet - the article specifically says it's not the Edwards rumor (unless there's ANOTHER Edwards story and the author is just throwing people off the scent), and the chances are slim that the MSM would bother to publish if it's a 'lesser' candidate than Hillary-Obama-Edwards. Of course it goes without saying that it's not a Republican, else the LA Times would not be agonizing over any such dilemma. Without any real info to go on, I'd bet on Obama too, for why else would the LA Times agonize about it? Maybe they'd also agonize over a new Clinton scandal, but probably not as much.

[woofie]

Bill Richardson has a lot going on in the sex department but who cares?

[tcrlaf]

If it were a Republican, the networks would be running with 24/7 coverage. There ARE no “Ethical Dilemas” if it’s a Republican, especially with the L.A. Times.

IF it were a republican, they would be running the COMPLETELY UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMORS as Page 1.
(Remember The Holy Memo?)