Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimboster

1- They are holding on: It has to be a DUmbo

2- They are thinking of releasing it: It has to be for punishing somebody for Hitlery’s loss in the last debate

3- Most likely, it’s Obama or Edwards

4- If it were Edwards, they would have come out with it

4- Obama is a minority and that’s scary for the MSM this is why the hand-wringing

Just trying to make sense of a convoluted MSM.


388 posted on 10/31/2007 1:54:10 PM PDT by melancholy (Beware of Ho Chi Minh's offspring, Ho She Marx , invading the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy
No, it’s the MSM for all those reasons.

Hillary - since they MUST protect her.

Lesbian/homosexual live-in lover? It would titillate millions, but would it GAIN votes from anybody but her existing Rosie/West Hollywood/New York fashion voters?

No.

Hillary being a lesbian is repulsive to most voters (though the evidence woiuld IMMEDIATELY get billions of Internet hits!) and the “lover” would become famous/infamous - but HILLARY would gain no votes and no influence.

Now.... If Hillary! were attractive, the case would be different. She WOULD gain the Paris-Lindsey-Brittney younger voters would vote their gonads and not their brains.... But Hillary is a repulsive, ugly old hag. (Janet Reno in lesbian drag) and so exposing Hillary! as a lesbian is NOT going to get her votes in her core, audience = sing;e young women.

392 posted on 10/31/2007 5:00:27 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson