Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sue Perkick
The statins are bad news. There has to be a better alternative. But I haven’t found it yet.

Niaspan worked for me. HDL's up, LDLs down, TG down, all in current "Optimum" ranges now. Cannot/Will no longer take Statins.

It's a Rx timed-release Niacin. The downside is the usual flushing one gets from niacin, but moderated. Taking it with beer and curry is a BAD idea...impressive flushing for twenty minutes.

That said, it's the only thing that has worked for me. High cholesterol is genetic in my case..I have a sister with high cholesterol who is a gym rat/health nut who eats lettuce, and that's about it. But no adverse CV history in the family.

I remain unconvinced about the new "Optimium" numbers, such as 100mg/dL, because people who do studies get no followon funding if they say the wrong thing. Studies funded by Merck, Pfizer, etc., I strongly dispute. Of Course. For hundreds of millenia we were cholesterol-gobbling hunters, but now, for the duration of the statin patents, suddenly the maximum total cholesterol has been halved, as though by a magic wand.

Sure.

93 posted on 10/31/2007 3:24:54 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Food imported from China = "Cesspool + Flavor-Straw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Gorzaloon

I’m happy for the people who haven’t had these side effects from the statins. But they seem to be poison for others. I’ve seen enough to know I will NEVER take them. I intend to do everything I can to find an alternative for my husband.


96 posted on 10/31/2007 6:37:29 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson