[steve86]

In general, I want people who willingly take jobs to either do their jobs or quit their jobs. Is this unreasonable

The majority of pharmacists employed now chose their careers long before the drug in question was available.

[blaquebyrd]

"The majority of pharmacists employed now chose their careers long before the drug in question was available."

True, but now they are employed by companies that make money off of and pay their salaries with the profits earned from the sale of medicine they object to. That's like being a security guard at an abortion clinic. They may not perform the abortions but they are profiting from it. Wouldn't it make more sense to quit rather than accept a salary from a company who practices what you condemn?

[aNYCguy]

The majority of pharmacists employed now chose their careers long before the drug in question was available.

I fail to see the relevance of this fact. The fact remains that voluntary employees have a choice to perform the duties entailed by their jobs, or seek other employment, absolutely regardless of the fact that these duties may vary over time.