Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: achilles2000
OK. I fully understand why nobody wrote newspaper articles about this. I also now understand why parents don’t care about these laws. I read every word of it and find it very convoluted and in some parts don’t even know what it means. I saw that Catholic Schools (which my family attends) are not included in this. Public Schools are no longer able to taunt gays but they also can’t say that being gay is a sin. I would rather tell my children at home about what is sinful and what is not. Am I missing something??? I know I did...lol.
134 posted on 10/29/2007 11:05:15 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

Private schools are included if they directly or indirectly receive state money. So, almost every Catholic university and college in CA is subject to this law (Thomas Aquinas College may be one of the exceptions). All the religious schools can do now is litigate about the “tenets” of their denomination to see if they fall in the “religious exemption”. Homosexual legal groups will use litigation extortionately against Christian organizations.

You don’t understand how “robust” the homosexuals’ position on non-discrimination is. This legislation requires that homosexual/bisexual/weird gender lifestyles be affirmatively presented as morally equivalent to heterosexuality. This applies to representations of the family and marriage. In addition, the definition of gender is radically postmodern - your gender is what you determine it is. Thus, consider the full implications of not “discriminating” on the basis fo gender.

Don’t overlook what 51500 does to curriculum and every activity within a school. It doesn’t cover things that are discriminatory (i.e. “privilege heterosexuality or promote heteronormativity”), it covers things that aren’t discriminatory (those are in 220)but which may promote a discriminatory bias on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, etc.

The impact on textbooks nationally could be very significant.


136 posted on 10/29/2007 11:24:34 AM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Private schools are included if they directly or indirectly receive state money. So, almost every Catholic university and college in CA is subject to this law (Thomas Aquinas College may be one of the exceptions). All the religious schools can do now is litigate about the “tenets” of their denomination to see if they fall in the “religious exemption”. Homosexual legal groups will use litigation extortionately against Christian organizations.

You don’t understand how “robust” the homosexuals’ position on non-discrimination is. This legislation requires that homosexual/bisexual/weird gender lifestyles be affirmatively presented as morally equivalent to heterosexuality. This applies to representations of the family and marriage. In addition, the definition of gender is radically postmodern - your gender is what you determine it is. Thus, consider the full implications of not “discriminating” on the basis fo gender.

Don’t overlook what 51500 does to curriculum and every activity within a school. It doesn’t cover things that are discriminatory (i.e. “privilege heterosexuality or promote heteronormativity”), it covers things that aren’t discriminatory (those are in 220)but which may promote a discriminatory bias on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, etc.

The impact on textbooks nationally could be very significant.


137 posted on 10/29/2007 11:25:07 AM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Private schools are included if they directly or indirectly receive state money. So, almost every Catholic university and college in CA is subject to this law (Thomas Aquinas College may be one of the exceptions). All the religious schools can do now is litigate about the “tenets” of their denomination to see if they fall in the “religious exemption”. Homosexual legal groups will use litigation extortionately against Christian organizations.

You don’t understand how “robust” the homosexuals’ position on non-discrimination is. This legislation requires that homosexual/bisexual/weird gender lifestyles be affirmatively presented as morally equivalent to heterosexuality. This applies to representations of the family and marriage. In addition, the definition of gender is radically postmodern - your gender is what you determine it is. Thus, consider the full implications of not “discriminating” on the basis fo gender.

Don’t overlook what 51500 does to curriculum and every activity within a school. It doesn’t cover things that are discriminatory (i.e. “privilege heterosexuality or promote heteronormativity”), it covers things that aren’t discriminatory (those are in 220)but which may promote a discriminatory bias on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, etc.

The impact on textbooks nationally could be very significant.


138 posted on 10/29/2007 11:25:29 AM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Look for “Gender Bending Reality” in Friday’s Malden Observer. We only have about 6,000 subscriptions but we do get picked up on-line.


145 posted on 10/29/2007 12:50:09 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson