Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA tip off prevented Indo-Israeli strike on Pakistan N-facility in '80s
Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) ^ | Oct. 28 ,2007

Posted on 10/28/2007 11:56:43 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

India, Israel planned to hit Kahuta in early ‘80s

NEW DELHI Oct. 28 (APP): India and Israel had secretly planned to hit Pakistan’s nuclear facility in Kahuta near Islamabad in 1983-84, but backed off when the CIA in 1984 tipped off then President General Zia-ul Haq.

“The Asian Age” reported this in its report published on Sunday from London quoting details revealed by investigative journalists Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott-Clark in their new book, Deception: Pakistan, the United States and the Global Weapons Conspiracy.

The authors also revealed details about India’s secret intelligence links with Israel at the time when officially the two countries did not have any diplomatic contacts. “In February 1983, with the strike plan at an advanced stage, Indian military officials had travelled secretly to Israel, which had a common interest in eliminating (A.Q.) Khan, to buy electronic warfare equipment to neutralise Kahuta’s air defences,” the book said.

Indian put its plans on hold after Raja Ramanna, then director of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, was warned by the then Chairman of Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission Munir Ahmed Khan in Vienna in the autumn of 1983 that Islamabad would attack Trombay, if its facilities in Kahuta were attacked.

At this juncture, the book said, Israel suggested that they would carry out the raid on Kahuta using the Indian Jamnagar base in Gujarat to launch its jets and another IAF base in northern India to refuel. “In March 1984, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi signed off (on) the Israeli-led operation, bringing India, Pakistan and Israel to within a hair’s breadth of a nuclear conflagration.”

However, the authors said India and Israel backed off from the plan after the CIA tipped off President Zia ul Haq and the US state department warned India that “the US will be responsive if India persists.”

The book further said Prime Minister Indira Gandhi then aborted the operation despite protests from military planners in New Delhi and Jerusalem. The authors quoting Gen. K.M. Arif, who was at the time Vice Chief of Pakistan Army as saying: “Our friends had let us know what the Israelis and Indians intended to do, and so we let them know how we would respond. Both sides were harrying the other and were absolutely aware of the consequences of every move. In the end, it was India that blinked.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aqkhan; india; israel; nuclear; pakistan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Tallguy
[Consider what was going on in Afghanistan at the time.]
 
All thanks to the administration Jimmy Carter.
 
 
 

21 posted on 10/29/2007 8:59:13 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

These guys regularly slam the Pakistani media and discredit it, unless it says something anti-American and then they eat it up.


22 posted on 10/29/2007 9:39:07 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Remember well, the term, 'ally' isn't in the same as in the usual context. India never is, and never has been, an "ally" of anyone except herself.

I will agree with this, but the times have changed - the USAF has been conducting long-range training with India's Air force, and helping to bring them up to speed on long-range aerial warfare (including working with them on aerial refueling). Why that is happening, I do not know. They publicized the hell out of it as well, obviously sending a message to somebody...
23 posted on 10/29/2007 9:48:26 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentIsTheProblem
Those are not Soviet era stars. Those are the symbols of the Kerala Communist Party. Your fiancee might have also seen other symbols, including a lotus and also a figure shaped like the palm of the hand. The latter two are the symbols of the other political parties. All three have to win votes to stay in power, during regularly held elections.

The Communists are technically Socialists, and can never have absolute power like in the case of the Soviet Union or China. The Indian Constitution simply forbids such a power arrangement. They are like the Communist Party, USA, except that the Kerala equivalents have won power a couple of times. Currently the recent state elections were won by the Congress Party, who are moderate-to-right wing. Kerala, and the other state of West Bengal, are the only two states among the 28 that have ever had the Communist Party win power.

24 posted on 10/29/2007 11:37:34 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

They’re for practising inter-operability, in case there ever needs a combined Indo-US front against a third country (read: China).


25 posted on 10/29/2007 11:39:39 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Oops, "...in case there ever needs be a combined..."

Personally, I think the US can handle all possible threats against it, on its own, currently. But, the training is for those 'just-in-case' scenarios.

26 posted on 10/29/2007 11:44:45 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interesting. Will have to read the book.

Intriguing that Israel was willing to take on this project and that India had actually had the guts to contemplate it.

No doubt the US looked the other way at Kahuta while the Afghani Jihad was funded by the US and Saudis. Nailing the Soviets was more important than worrying about the Pakis getting the bomb.


27 posted on 10/31/2007 1:04:36 PM PDT by swarthyguy (USAma FreedomDay - Day 2247. Who loves ya, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Could also have been a strong motive in wanting to get rid of Indira to forestall any future attempts.

Khalistani assets utilised.

Speculative, sure, but history is awfully strange.


28 posted on 12/07/2010 11:32:46 AM PST by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes! Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -America is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

Who knows-the old lady was cynical and played all sides, but she got things done.


29 posted on 12/07/2010 8:46:08 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson