The rest of us knew it, Hillary. Your naïveté is one of your numerous, dangerous liabilities.
Some women are more equal than others.
so what...I have a book in the library that says Bill fell in love with Hillary becasue Hillary loved three wys....two women and Bill....Bill said “ cool, I’m all in”
|
What about the Clintons being drug lords in Mena, Arkansas? Now there’s a story.
Not exactly “new” news. I wouldn’t count on this having any effect on Hillary’s electability.
Bill Clinton’s Arkansas state environmental director (state cabinet post) left Bill to work for my dad.
Hillary knew all this stuff and everyone knew she was stronger and he feared her. I think I first heard this around 87
Ohhh, NO! Say it ain't SO!
/ s
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
It’s NOT her”naivete’”,it’s that she knows that her willing accomplices(Drive Bys)will give her all the cover they can!!!
I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell ya. Who'd a thunk......
The Faustian bargain....
The ILLEGAL FUNDRAISING SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO SINK HER!!! Where’s the FBI?????Where’s McCAin and FEINGOLD??? Where’s the FEC??? Where’s the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT???
I thought Hillary's real shock came when she found out Bill gave Monica the same book of poetry that he gave to Hillary in college:
"In March 1997, Lewinsky addressed a note to "Mr. P," thanking Clinton for giving her a bound edition of Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass as a present: "Like Shakespeare, Whitman's writings are so timeless. I find solace in works from the past that remain profound and somehow always poignant. Whitman is so rich that one must read him like one tastes a fine wine or a good cigar -- take it in, roll it in your mouth, and savor it."
Source:
http://www.ardemgaz.com/prev/Clinton/aamonicasided22.html
She’s such a pleasant, warm, charming woman, it’s hard to see why Bill would ever stray. < /s>
Let's see: this appears to be an effort to fiegn credulity in order to stimulate credulity in the masses.
For, if memory serves, the public new bill clinton was a skirt-chaser before his first election.
The public knew. And she expects us to believe that she didn't? I'm quite sure the oval office wasn't the only "insane" thing her husband has done.
Does this creature expect us to believe she didn't know about the State Police escort to the motel room?
And what could she tell us of things the American public hasn't been subjected to having to learn about the President Scumbucket?
Thank you but no thank you, senator sweep-it-under-the-rug.
Monica was the coverup.
It was probably even Hillary’s idea.
Treason was the reason, and still is.
Perhaps part of her motives are rooted in the nature of betrayed women to prove that they are better than their husbands.
How great for america that her ambition might be rooted in something more warped than ordinary power-lust; that it might just be rooted in the hell-hath-no-fury-as-a-woman-scorned wellspring of the netherworld. How great for her to exercise her personal demons at the expense of the free and the brave.