Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: uksupport1

The problem with UK forces is they are too small.

It started becoming obvious that the UK decided to make Afganistan the main effort almost a year ago. What is happening now is an acceleration of that transfer of forces.

The ISF in Basrah was not ready and was not planned to be ready until Mid-late 2008. Hense the sudden diversion of forces from Ninawa, Anbar, Salahadin, Wasit and Baghdad to accelerate the stand-up of 14th Division. That was a change in plans that happened in Jun/Jul. In May, the 12th was still on schedule and half the ISOF elements were in Mosul and Al Asad.

This accelerated transfer of UK assets has effectively delayed operations in the hot provinces of the north by shifting major elements to Basrah ahead of schedule.


35 posted on 10/28/2007 9:46:57 AM PDT by DJ Elliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DJ Elliott

“This accelerated transfer of UK assets has effectively delayed operations in the hot provinces of the north by shifting major elements to Basrah ahead of schedule.”

This is incorrect. There was no ‘accelerated transfer’. Actually it had been delayed a little from initial announcements.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,1780432,00.html

May 2006 - Iraqi’s could control security by the end of the year.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6173234.stm

November 2006 - Margaret Beckett confident that British troops would be able to pull back to the airport and hand over control of basra ‘sometime in the spring of 2007’.


36 posted on 10/28/2007 9:59:57 AM PDT by UKTory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson