To: Hydroshock
Sure, the Feds put together a law, basically saying the Federal goverment was lousy at their job, and expected the locals to take care of it. Giuliani told them to stuff it, and if they were serious about immigration law, the Feds had to prove it first before NYC would cooperate again.
You seem to forget WHY the sanctuary laws developed in the 80's.
I know "Rudy is pro-illegal invader" is a nice bumper sticker, but illegal immigration is much more complicated than that and needs a myriad of solutions that involves all levels of government, STARTING with the Federal government securing the borders.Sanctuary cities will fade away after that.
110 posted on
10/28/2007 10:20:37 AM PDT by
jonathanmo
(So many phobes, so little time...)
To: jonathanmo
He supported a sanctuary city policy that is all I need to know about him being against me on immigration.
112 posted on
10/28/2007 11:01:51 AM PDT by
Hydroshock
("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
To: jonathanmo
Denial, spin, and BS.
He broke the law and encouraged illegals to come to his city. When you put out sugar, you better expect ants. If Rudy was smart enough to see the consequences of his actions, he didn’t deserve to be mayor and surely doesn’t deserve to be POTUS.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson