Skip to comments.
Medical marijuana advocate kills herself
Missoulian.com ^
| 10/26/07
| MICHAEL MOORE
Posted on 10/26/2007 11:34:42 PM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-249 next last
...the pain of an immunosuppressive disorder...
Maybe, in the future, there will be a cure. Marijuana doesn't seem to be it.
To: Libloather
Maybe, in the future, there will be a cure. Marijuana doesn't seem to be it. Be sure to pat yourself on the back. This woman was suffering and you would rather see her kill herself than to allow medical marijuana be used to help her. That is such an ethical choice.
2
posted on
10/26/2007 11:39:39 PM PDT
by
burzum
(None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
To: Libloather
Prayers for this poor soul. May she RIP.
3
posted on
10/26/2007 11:41:04 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Libloather
Marijuana might be the cure for something...but too many folks will think of it as the cure for everything. Then it goes downhill fast.
But on the positive side...if we could ever find something to use it for...legally...and could tax it....we’d cut out income tax within three years. Course, we’d all be addicted and smoking a dozen joints a day and act like potheads.
To: Libloather
May the God of peace be merciful and bestow His grace upon His servant Robin Prosser, and may perpetual Light shine upon her.
5
posted on
10/26/2007 11:46:53 PM PDT
by
Hornitos
To: burzum
...and you would rather...I said nothing of the sort. Shut up and sit down.
6
posted on
10/26/2007 11:56:17 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(Hillary donors find their way to the cover of Time. Funny, the very next day, they're doing it...)
To: pepsionice
But on the positive side...if we could ever find something to use it for...legally...and could tax it....wed cut out income tax within three years. Course, wed all be addicted and smoking a dozen joints a day and act like potheads. I think your major premise is wrong here. I don't think marijuana causes people to act like potheads. I think potheads are one group of people who use marijuana just because they are potheads. When marijuana was made illegal and the penalties for use increased, the casual user was scared off. Now marijuana sold on the streets is much more concentrated in THC than what it was decades ago. This is because the primary customer, the potheads, want the extreme effects. The same is true for all illegal drugs. Cocaine sold at the turn of the 20th century is nothing in concentration like cocaine sold to people today.
7
posted on
10/26/2007 11:58:56 PM PDT
by
burzum
(None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
To: Hornitos
8
posted on
10/27/2007 12:00:34 AM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Libloather
Would you rather have this woman suffer and commit suicide rather than allow marijuana be used as a treatment?
A simple yes or no will suffice.
9
posted on
10/27/2007 12:01:31 AM PDT
by
burzum
(None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
To: burzum
...rather than allow marijuana be used as a treatment?It was used as a treatment. Did you read anything before you knee-jerk reaction?
10
posted on
10/27/2007 12:05:53 AM PDT
by
Libloather
(Hillary donors find their way to the cover of Time. Funny, the very next day, they're doing it...)
To: burzum
Would you rather have this woman suffer and commit suicide rather than allow marijuana be used as a treatment? A simple yes or no will suffice.
And do you still beat your children?
"A simple yes or no will suffice."
11
posted on
10/27/2007 12:06:21 AM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: burzum
I know you weren't asking me but your question is the core one.
I don't see how anyone who's not for banning alcohol can be for banning pot. As long as no one makes me smoke that crap, they can do what they want in their own homes, as far as I'm concerned--that's the conservative, small-government response.
12
posted on
10/27/2007 12:06:30 AM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life atheist Bostonian. If I don't respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
To: burzum
Be sure to pat yourself on the back. This woman was suffering and you would rather see her kill herself than to allow medical marijuana be used to help her.Instead of taking this obviously biased article as the Gospel truth (written by someone named "Michael Moore", probably not that Michael Moore, but certainly someone who shares Fatso's journalistic objectivity), you may want to read a little deeper into the "reportage". For example, the article says that "Prosser suffered from an autoimmune disease that gave her allergic and dangerous reactions to most pharmaceutical painkillers". It also states that Prosser had located an alternate source for her medical weed, "but it didn't go well". It sounds to me that, the journalist's bias notwithstanding ("So she turned to marijuana. When that was no longer available she had no where else to turn".), MS Prosser may well have had other options for pain relief, but preferred her pot to other medications that would relief her pain, but would not give her that nice buzz that would have relieved the depression that probably was the actual cause of her suicide.
To: Libloather
We don't make laws and policy based on a few exceptional cases.
This is a demagogic sob story, aka "Women and minorities hit hardest..."
To: Libloather
I think the 'treatment' for such disorders aren't one-off measures, but rather, for life.
From the article:
"Without the relief that marijuana delivered to her, Robin Prosser killed herself at home last week. She was 50. "
15
posted on
10/27/2007 12:09:26 AM PDT
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: Libloather
At the time, the DEA special agent in charge of the Rocky Mountain Field Division said federal agents were protecting people from their own state laws by seizing such shipments.
~~~
Once again States Rights goes down the tube,,,
I for one don’t care if this woman was smokin’ Monkey Turds
If it helped her,,,
Thank You Big Brother For Protecting Me From A “Dope Fiend”.
16
posted on
10/27/2007 12:10:09 AM PDT
by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
Thank You Big Brother For Protecting Me From A Dope Fiend.Take it easy. The woman just died...
17
posted on
10/27/2007 12:12:11 AM PDT
by
Libloather
(Hillary donors find their way to the cover of Time. Funny, the very next day, they're doing it...)
To: Darkwolf377
Exactly. I may be wrong, but I haven’t heard anything against the convincing argument that legalisation would render the drug dealers, and their inherent crime problems, obsolete.
18
posted on
10/27/2007 12:13:12 AM PDT
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: Libloather
"...fear spread through the system of marijuana distribution set up in the wake of the medical marijuana act. Friends said Prosser turned to other sources for marijuana, but found problems nearly everywhere she turned. Most recently, she had found some people who said they could get her what she needed, but it didn't go well, said her friend Jane Byard."
Women in back-alleys again...
19
posted on
10/27/2007 12:17:10 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: Libloather
Maybe, in the future, there will be a cure. Marijuana doesn't seem to be it.
No one is asserting that a particular treatment is a cure, just that if its use alleviates the symptoms of those who are suffering then they ought to be allow the treatment.
20
posted on
10/27/2007 12:19:56 AM PDT
by
Hornitos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-249 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson