Its sad to say that Bill Clinton appears to be a more reasonable person than Ron Paul.
Its also sad to say, in a head-to-head contest between Clinton and Paul ... I’d lean toward Bubba. Perish the thought.
H
I know the feeling. It’s like when watching an NFL game where you hate both teams, but you want one to lose to help out the team you do like, making you root for the other one (example for me - rooting for the hated Rams playing the Seahawks because the Seahawks losing helps the 49ers - okay, so I’m delusional).
>>Its also sad to say, in a head-to-head contest between Clinton and Paul ... I’d lean toward Bubba. Perish the thought.
<<
This leads to an interesting question, and I am NO Clinton fan, as a perusal of my posts since 1998 will attest.
Sure he was negligent BEFORE the 9/11 attacks, but being the showboater that he is, I wonder if he would have kicked ass and taken names AFTER 9/11, if it were possible for him to have been in office? And the dems would have been cheering him on, as well as the Republicans.
Now that’s a weird thought, isn’t it? P.S. Did I mention I am NO Clinton fan?
Now THATS saying something!