Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Scott Beauchamp Update (or How To Say Nothing in 1000 Words)
The New Republic ^ | Oct. 26,2007 | Unknown

Posted on 10/26/2007 10:43:12 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Make a charge, and then it's the defendant's responsibility to prove that it didn't happen. Welcome to America 2007.
1 posted on 10/26/2007 10:43:15 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Mary Mapes school of journalism.


2 posted on 10/26/2007 10:49:43 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The answer is simple: Since this controversy began, The New Republic’s sole objective has been to uncover the truth.

Stopped reading here - all lies after that.

3 posted on 10/26/2007 10:50:53 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Perhaps you just define “truth” in a different way than they do.


4 posted on 10/26/2007 10:53:34 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

On the TNR site there’s an unrelated column with an unfortunate headline: What Lies Ahead


5 posted on 10/26/2007 10:54:23 AM PDT by SoCalRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I use concrete for my definitions.

They use Silly Putty.


6 posted on 10/26/2007 10:54:30 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoCalRight

Seems their Freudian Slip is showing...


7 posted on 10/26/2007 10:55:05 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
But this process has involved maddening delays compounded by bad faith on the part of at least some officials in the Army.

Maybe it because they're just a little busy fighting a flippin' WAR.

8 posted on 10/26/2007 10:56:19 AM PDT by BFM (CLINTON is and always will be a rapist. Never forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne


9 posted on 10/26/2007 10:57:32 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
>>The answer is simple: Since this controversy began, The New Republic’s sole objective has been to uncover the truth.<<

If these clowns were interested in the truth, they wouldn’t have published those ridiculous lies in the first place. This is the worse job of CYA I’ve ever seen. This is worse than “the dog ate my homework” and just as juvenile.

10 posted on 10/26/2007 10:57:53 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
we published in our July 23 issue, we have continued our investigation into the article’s veracity.

  1. Publish.
  2. Investigate.
Is there something wrong with the order of events here?
11 posted on 10/26/2007 10:58:59 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The next day, via his wife, we learned that Beauchamp did want to stand by his stories and wanted to communicate with us again.

One possibility is that he was blowing off steam to his wife, and SHE pushed the story (she is some sort of deputy associate assistant editor at TNR).

Or maybe SHE thought it a good idea to make up the story and get him to "corroborate" it.

Fake but accurate, you know.

12 posted on 10/26/2007 11:02:40 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The New Republic is deeply frustrated by the Army’s behavior.

I guess the feeling is mutual.

13 posted on 10/26/2007 11:06:04 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The answer is simple: Since this controversy began, The New Republic’s sole objective has been to uncover the truth.

Ha, ha, ha, ha. Oh, no, the New Republic has no political agenda, no axe to grind. They are only interested in objective reporting. That's really been noticeable over the years. Not.

Their order of procedure is, as it was in this case, have an agenda, write a story to support it, and then pretend that the administration is preventing them from doing an actual investigation, so it's not their fault if the facts on which the story was based were entirely falsified.

14 posted on 10/26/2007 11:06:20 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Seems to me, after reading this article, that the main pressure on Beauchamp (and his wife) is coming from the Left who has as much invested in losing this war, as the military does in winning it.

Here is related information from Michael Yon that gives more insight into what’s happening with Beauchamp, and the FR thread discussing it:

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/beauchamp-and-the-rule-of-second-chances.htm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1916282/posts


15 posted on 10/26/2007 11:15:43 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I hope Beauchamp by this time is cleaning Iraqi outhouses.


16 posted on 10/26/2007 11:23:09 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyJo
I had read the Michael Yon piece, and find myself in agreement with the idea that, if anyone can make a man out of a two-bit punk, the Army can do it, and if they're willing to give it another go, then so am I.

Beauchamp is an ignorant punk, and he did an ignorant punkish thing.

TNR, on the other hand, should know better.

Ignorance is curable, but stupidity is not.

17 posted on 10/26/2007 11:25:31 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
I hope Beauchamp by this time is cleaning Iraqi outhouses.

I don't; I hope he's fighting his butt off to kill the bad guys over there. I hope he's learning WHO the bad guys really are. I hope he's on point and wondering if the guy behind him knows about the stunt he pulled.

18 posted on 10/26/2007 11:31:53 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LucyJo

I was reading what Yon wrote and thought he did a good job. Beauchamp, however, needs to be sent home immediately. This is continuing to give the Army a black eye and also provide cover for TNR. If Beauchamp stands by his story, why did he not have the balls to say so when his superiors were in the room. Seems he wants it both ways, recanting to his fellow soldiers and telling TNR and his wife he stands behind his story. Get him the hell out of Iraq and out of the army now.


19 posted on 10/26/2007 11:58:00 AM PDT by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Didn’t know that about Beauchamp’s wife working there. Glad you mentioned it. That makes me even more cynical about TNR’s “search for the truth”. The thirst for the BIG story, and a contribution to the BIG agenda must be overwhelming for them.


20 posted on 10/26/2007 11:59:01 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson