Thanks for continuing to post this.
How can a man who believes that humans can control the earth’s climate be considered sane enough to be the President of the USA?
Global warming is one of my top litmus tests to even be considered for my vote.
When he said he would support a federal smoking ban I figured he was no better than Bloomberg or most Democrats. Yet in the debate the other day he tried to sound like a conservative, and said we would suffer a loss of personal freedoms under a Clinton presidency?? Sounds like HRC is no worse than he is in many ways.