Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As One Who Stood Against Horowitz--Outside Group Stifles Horowitz Speech
National Project to Defend Dissent & Critical Thinking in Academia ^ | 10-26-07

Posted on 10/26/2007 8:12:47 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: MNJohnnie

Pathetic. I wonder if they would go to a Paul Simon concert and demand their turn on the guitar? Or a demand that Ann Coulter get a rebuttal session to every Hillary speech?

Hell - these people can’t even stand that Rush has his own radio show.

It’s not your speech, assmonkey. If you want time to speak yourself, say something worthwhile so that people will invite you to come speak.

This is the problem with libs - they think they simply DESERVE equality. Horowitz has made a name for himself that is bigger than theirs. They can’t deal with that. These protesters need to realize that they are NOBODIES and that if they want equality with someone who actually is a SOMEBODY they should make something of themselves (other than making asses of themselves).


21 posted on 10/26/2007 8:33:07 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

ping


22 posted on 10/26/2007 8:33:16 AM PDT by joeystoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I thought a university was a place you attended to become exposed to different ideas. Instead, this guy, and his fascist leftist friends, didn’t want to listen. It’s all about them. All about their protests. Differing ideas must be shut down. All of them.


23 posted on 10/26/2007 8:37:59 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Correct me if I missed something, but this person who said they stood silent to protest Horowitz’s speech, never once touched on the salient point of that speech, which is that Islamism is a mortal danger to the west and seeks to enforce the Three Demands on us (convert, submit or die).

So, the exact complaint against Horowitz was what? What he said or the fact he was attempting to speak? It appears from the video of the event, the protest was against the content.

The Left loves to scold the rest of us when we object to something they are presenting on television or National Public Radio. Their standard answer is, if you don’t like it you are free to change the channel. In other words, if you are standing in an area where someone is saying something you disagree with, you are free to leave.

Well, these people were free to leave when Horowitz was speaking, but instead of extending to him what they demand of the rest of us, they made it impossible for him to speak.

Free speech is dead on this campus.

24 posted on 10/26/2007 8:39:23 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

These libidiots have set a precedence. What would they say about “free speech” protests if conservatives stood and booed their speakers, including Hitlery? Oh, I know, they would be maced, tazed and thrown out of the building, then arrested. O’Reilly tried to argue with a female RAT spokeswoman last night about the Horowitz affair, and she said over and over that the protest was “free speech”. Liberals are truly insane.


25 posted on 10/26/2007 8:40:58 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Did you read yesterday’s thread on Latino Unidos? They don’t want anyone on campus who’s at odds with their mission.


26 posted on 10/26/2007 8:42:37 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

No, I missed that.


27 posted on 10/26/2007 8:43:47 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
People with a deep understanding of who Horowitz is and his agenda of playing the victim while organizing attacks on dissent and critical thinking on campuses, creating a pogromist atmosphere against Muslims, and preparing the groundwork for war on Iran, argued that it was crucial to expose his lies and demand that he answer to what the United States is doing to people here and around the world.

My God, this is chillingly Stalinist.


28 posted on 10/26/2007 8:44:28 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

NPR was going to do a piece on Horowitz the other day. I didn’t hear that, but I did hear how the local station introduced it: “Coming up we have a segment on David Horowitz, who runs smear campaigns against professors whose political views he disagrees with.”


29 posted on 10/26/2007 8:47:18 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Should have just shot the rat bastards.


30 posted on 10/26/2007 8:48:45 AM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
" we arrived to the event Wednesday night to a few stacks of index cards with instructions to write our questions down. I believe that it was this situation that led many to shout out, feeling their voices would not be heard otherwise."

No proof or facts... just "feelings" so they took it upon themselves to act like jackasses without writing down questions nor listening to that which they had opposing "feelings" about.

31 posted on 10/26/2007 8:51:35 AM PDT by avacado (Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

These Leftist would be first to join the brown shirts of the Nazi era.


32 posted on 10/26/2007 8:51:40 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
My God, this is chillingly Stalinist.

Wow. Had not thought about it but you are just so so right. This is completely in the mode of Stalin.

33 posted on 10/26/2007 8:52:58 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yo Democrats, You don't tell us how to wage war, we will not tell you how to be the village idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
From Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda by Leonard W. Doob

14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.

a. They must evoke desired responses which the audience previously possesses

b. They must be capable of being easily learned

c. They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations

d. They must be boomerang-proof

18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.

34 posted on 10/26/2007 8:56:59 AM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

After going through the multi-paragraph whinefest at the so-called “National Project to Defend Dissent & Critical Thinking in Academia” website, I looked a place to leave a comment, but apparently they aren’t interested in the views of anyone other than themselves. Predictable from a leftist group that disrupted a public event on the grounds that their views wouldn’t be heard by an audience who’d come to hear a specific speaker discuss a specific subject.


35 posted on 10/26/2007 8:57:31 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
What would they say about “free speech” protests if conservatives stood and booed their speakers, including Hitlery? Oh, I know, they would be maced, tazed and thrown out of the building, then arrested

That's what happens when you ask John Kerry a question.

36 posted on 10/26/2007 9:00:09 AM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
My God, this is chillingly Stalinist.

And after free speech is stifled, when they come for your guns, make sure you are ready to shoot the ba$tard that sent them.

Not to be an alarmist, but somethings make me think CWII is around the corner. And this is one of them.

5.56mm

37 posted on 10/26/2007 9:01:49 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sir, you are clearly of another world and have overdosed on the kool aid. You lost me and likely most with your inane comment about feeling as if you would not be heard because you were requested to write down your questions. This type of request is universal at these sorts of events. Your excuses are as weak as your political philosophy

What you meant was you and your communist friends wanted to ensure that ONLY your side was heard at the expense of any other views except yours.

You and your kind are merely thugs and your position is so very weak that you cannot possibly allow any conflicting views to be heard.

BTW, since you are admitted Communists, can you tell us any instance and any part of the world where Communism has succeeded? No, how about not succeeded but been as economically beneficial at the rate of even 5% of capitalism and democracy?

I think it was Churchill who said it best when he claimed

“The vice of capitalism is that it stands for the unequal distribution of goods and services,” said Churchill. “The virtue of socialism is that it stands for the equal distribution of misery.”

38 posted on 10/26/2007 9:03:23 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
there would have been a much better chance that the disruption would have calmed.

So the author is admitting that there was a disruption.The anarchic concept of freedom allows disruptors to violate the private property rights of owners of theaters whenever they feel like it.So, where was the university? What is their policy with respect to anarchic freedom? If they disagreed with the concept of anarchic freedom, then they should have brought the disruptions to a halt since they are the owners of the property.

39 posted on 10/26/2007 9:03:30 AM PDT by mjp (Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I simply MUST once again post the single most definitive statement by the worlds foremost political satirist. Read it my Communist friend and take note of the accuracy of its every word.:

"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosphy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke

40 posted on 10/26/2007 9:08:51 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson