Giuliani was a fervent supporter of partial birth abortion, far more pro-abortion than many Democrats, and he has also recently said that there is a constitutional right to have abortions paid for.
What good is Rudy’s “strict constructionism” if he still says that the constitution guarantees a woman’s right to an abortion at any stage for any reason, and that taxpayers are constitutionally obliged to pay for it?
His idea of the constitution is more like Ruth Bader Ginsburgh’s than mine.
By the way, hillary has also offered to compromise on abortion, although she hasn’t explained how. I’ve always pictured it as something like King Solomon and the two women, except that in hillary’s case the baby is actually cut in half.
Well with over half the country supportive of abortion only for the life of the mother, rape or incest, she knows there are votes to be lost by advocating abortion on demand, but I can't imagine her base would let her shade that much, and she'll be appointing activist judges for a host of reasons.