SENATE REPUBLICANS MAY SINK BUSH'S U.N. SEA TREATY

GOPUSA ^ | October 25, 2007 | Cliff Kincaid

[processing please hold]

especially true since the senate and too many in the House find themselves resurrecting what should remain long dead.

To enrich themselves no doubt. The word sovereignty to them is outdated.

[flat]

One man was out ahead on this. Yes, the usual guy.

#13. Do you support the Law of the Sea Treaty? If not, will you revoke it if it passes before you take office?

Hunter: No, in the past I have opposed the Law of the Sea Treaty. I expect that to continue. There are serious issues of sovereignty involved, and as in the past, I have no intention of letting US sovereignty be eroded.

YUP AND i want to see mitt et al soundly DENOUNCE THIS MADNESS....giving away american advantage to the FREAKIN UN?

damn....thats one step above jimmah who out and out GAVE AWAY the canal....

wait that aint ABOVE jimmah thats BELOW his shannigans...hell he only gave away one strategic site...we got libs and im sad to say ...’w’ (if it’s true) giving away the whole freakin ocean. WHAT MADNESS IS THIS?

[JOE43270]

Yes, I will and I’ve already done it six times telling my senators to vote no on the LOST. I will continue.

[nickcarraway]

"If you want a U.N. on steroids, you want the Law of the Sea Treaty," Senator Trent Lott (Miss.) declared at the news conference.

Since when did Trent Lott support a conservative position, or do something he hadn't been instructed to by the Democrats or the White House? What's gotten in to him?

[processing please hold]

Yes, I will and I’ve already done it six times telling my senators to vote no on the LOST. I will continue.

Thank you. I'll start on mine and others again tomorrow.

[processing please hold]

I don't know.

It's not the same man who voted on 'Dream' that's for sure. I don't know what he's up too.

Maybe they're waiting for the heat to be taken off them since this has been getting some coverage, mainly on forums and blogs but that's still getting the story out. Senators don't like for their constituents to see that they are selling out their sovereignty - at least on some issues.

Maybe he differentiates between illegal aliens destroying our country and the un destroying it. Who knows with politicians these days.

[nicmarlo]

lol. To them it’s so passe.

Boot the traitors out, I say.

[taxesareforever]

So true.

[cowdog77]

He’s a socialist trying to push the new world order on Americans.”
_________________

It was a sad day recently when I finally acknowledged the fact.

[processing please hold]

Boot the traitors out, I say.

I wish we could. They'll be the end of us if they aren't voted out of office. I had to say voted out, it is open forum after all.

[processing please hold]

:(

There's still hope.

[nicmarlo]

Indeed, it is. : )

[processing please hold]

;)

[mamelukesabre]

Gee, I thought I was the only one thinking that.

[processing please hold]

The un pfft.

Take a look at the three men whos country's are on the Human Rights Council.

http://www.eyeontheun.org/

A very good site for those who like to follow what the un is up to.

[processing please hold]

Whos——sorry, didn’t catch the missing ‘e’ fast enough.

[SUSSA]

the pact, supported by the Bush Administration and the liberal leadership in the Senate,

That's mostly the history of this administration. Birds of a feather. . .

[processing please hold]

Boy oh boy weren’t we fooled. Conservative....right.

[nicmarlo]

Take a look at the three men whos country's are on the Human Rights Council.

You've got to be joking!!

[SUSSA]

Not all of us were. Some of us warned about him in the first primaries. Most people refused to listen back then.