[SFConservative]

So here's a nutjob complaining about unproven unintended consequences of a long-established practice of using carbon-based fuels. He wants to counteract such unproven consequences with a "risky scheme" of deliberately messing with our upper atmosphere with marginally predictable benefits and untold potential for negative, uncontrollable unintended consequences.

Conservative analysis that CO₂ historically follows, not precedes warming = total heresy and unacceptable climate impacts.
Liberal activist nutjob climate mongering = can't fail - let's do it now - A-OK.

These people are dangerous and insane.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Ironically, they’ve already tested the theory of high-altitude particulates causing “global cooling” ......

Measurements of average temepratures in wide areas between 9/11-9/12-9/13 2001 when aircraft were shutdown showed a measureable RISE in earth’s temperatures of about 1/5 of one degree:

Thus, we are ALREADY combatting the 1/2 of one degree global warming by using jet airplanes to artifically cause cooling that opposes the warming. At a profit.

[cogitator]

Conservative analysis that CO2 historically follows, not precedes warming = total heresy and unacceptable climate impacts.

Please examine point #5 in my profile.