what a hugely disappointing article.
Not ONE mention of Thompson!!! proven conservative credentials and NO mention ... huh?!?
Romney dismissed on the basis of bigotry (he’s Mormon. Note to bigots: get over yourself about it, he’s running for president not pastor) NO mention of his support for Federal marriage Amendment.
And all this fluff about Huckabee. Why? Because he’s prolife. Is that so standout, in a field of multiple prolife contenders?
I'd suggest if you want to be consistent, then issue the following bulletins: Note to Baptists: get over yourself about it...if you vote for fellow Baptist Huckabee, then you're a bigot 'cause you're voting for a pastor, not a president. Then you'd also have to say: Note to Mormons: get over yourself about it...if you vote for fellow Mormon Romney, then you're a bigot 'cause you're voting for an ex-LDS bishop, not a president.
Let's show some consistency...or do you always go around utilizing liberal pot-shot tactics by engaging in name-calling?