For months, we’ve been hearing that, according to the FEC filings, Ron Paul leads the field in contributions from the military.
Are you suggesting that not only are the occupations of the donors not verified (”circus clown”, “slacker-in-chief”, etc), but the names aren’t either?
If the FEC information is so unreliable that even the names of the donors can’t be trusted, why did Paul supporters make such a big deal out of the number of supporters who listed military occupations?
For months, we’ve been hearing that, according to the FEC filings, Ron Paul leads the field in contributions from the military. Are you suggesting that not only are the occupations of the donors not verified (”circus clown”, “slacker-in-chief”, etc), but the names aren’t either?
If the FEC information is so unreliable that even the names of the donors can’t be trusted, why did Paul supporters make such a big deal out of the number of supporters who listed military occupations?