[Czar]

But they will just keep creating “conservancies” because they are so “romantic.”

I look at it as kind of an eminent domain as practiced by the environmental wackos and other associated do-gooders...i.e., nanny government hidden behind the cloak of preserving open spaces, parks and recreation areas "for future generations".

[SierraWasp]

Yes! In the tradition of collectivism, “for the good of all” to create “the tradegy of the commons!” That’s why I call it Commonism, instead of Communism. (largely the same with one little hardly noticable, minor difference)