Posted on 10/23/2007 5:14:25 PM PDT by dervish
As you said below: Sounds almost almost too good, too realistic, too detailed to be true.
But why would it be spread as propaganda - how effective could it be if it were false, if it were being spread as a hand-written note in a foreign language on a hand-written highway map?
‘Cuse me, gotta fix your spelling there: “Ill take some male too.”
thanks SC
Thanks.
Hey, guys...it’s Dub...shhh...
Can’t sleep and the SS won’t let me download MP3s...don’t tell anyone I’m posting here, k?
Now listen, if we’re gonna do Iran...do Iran right, know what I mean?...
...the LAST thing we need is ChiaPetHead jumping in at the wrong time...nuking Japan...shelling Seoul...legions hordeing south across the border...lobbing a couple IRBMs at Seattle...divide and conquor, see?
Make ya a deal...y’all let this little NK fiasco slide...for now...and I’ll crack the whip on Kimmy when the time is right, after Tehran’s a smokin hole...k?
Uh oh...Condi’s lookin for me, gotta go...mum’s the word...
L8R
(NOTE, DO NOT ADJUST YOUR MONITOR, THE ABOVE IS ONLY A DRAMATIZATION, MEANT TO ILLUSTRATE ONE OF NUMEROUS POSSIBILITIES. IN THE EVENT YOUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF EVER DOES CHOOSE TO PASS STATE SECRETS TO YOU USING THIS SECURE COMMUNICATIONS CHANNEL, THE SECRET CODEWORD WILL BE “ALGORE”, REPEAT, “ALGORE”. THIS TAPE WILL SELF DESTRUCT IN 30 SECONDS.)
More on what happened in Syria on 9/6/07 - ping!
And yet on national security she’s deficient..is that too hard for you to understand? Apparently so...
So - a Congressman blabbing to the WSJ is the way to ask for other Congressmen to be better briefed by the White House?
WEAK.
It's becase of the air defense. Things with Iran are coming to a head in the coming months. For Washington to go along with this and tip our hand as to what we can do to first-tier Russian air defense, well, it had to have been some serious ****.
It makes no sense at this time to lay it all out if it will compromise methods or future operations.
Besides, everybody knows N.Korea has no intention of following ANY agreements concerning nukes. We will continue to "talk" and isolate until China decides it is in her best interest to get Kim the hell out of there.
Only if they have checks in them.
I am not sure China would be really up to verifiable thorough denuclearization of N. Korea. It has been American wish for nearly 7 years, but China did not change its stance even after N. Korea's nuclear test. It is more interested in managing the status quo. China still hates U.S. more than N. Korea.
The only situation when China comes down hard on N. Korea is when N. Korea doublecrosses China and throw its lot with U.S. Anyway, you do not gain much by playing footsie with China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.