Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bobkk47

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/11/11/hubble.stars/index.html


64 posted on 10/23/2007 4:14:13 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Bobkk47

you’ll notice that in the article it states that they haven’t been “born” yet. This is typical. Scientists WANT, they NEED to see stars being born, so they say, oh, the interstellar nurseries are gas and dust, and our technology can penetrate to see first hand, but believe us! I repeat, no star has ever been observed to form. Science is all about observation. The Bible says that the universe has been subjected to futility. We know this. Entropy. Death. I repeat- we are running on fumes.


69 posted on 10/23/2007 4:21:53 PM PDT by yankeesdoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Bobkk47

Oh, and also, this is funny. Just using the conservation laws, momentum for example, that we know to be true, if you take a several light year-across collection of gas and dust, and crush it inwards into a stellar-sized object like our sun, if you do the math, when it is about the size of our sun, it would be rotating at 8 or so times light speed. Like a skater pulling in her arms. That’s some rotation.


73 posted on 10/23/2007 4:27:01 PM PDT by yankeesdoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson