But...this has probably already been ruled IT'S NOT AN ACT OF TERRORISM.
Yeah, okay. They already have someone in custody for arson, and know of at least another arsonist-committed fire....
It’s entirely possible that it is some kind of terrorism. It could be just about anything.
BTW - didn’t Fox say there is a new Al Qeada tape today?
“But...this has probably already been ruled IT’S NOT AN ACT OF TERRORISM.”
Why would we call a terrorist what he is? The entire media is already priming us with “Al Queda Associates in New Jersy” as headlines. So now someone associated with AQ goes from a terrorist to a mere associate...and guess what the determining factor was? The fact he was ON US SOIL. Wake the #$#@ up people. Illigal immigrants are merely migrants. People who yell Allah Akbar two times before being pumped full of lead in the Northwest by officers is merely a disgruntled youth who just happened to be muslim. Ok, I’ll stop there for now. Just damn (lmao) :)
In this case my first thoughts would have went to an ex-fireman or two whose careers took a sudden downward spriral, if the so-called expertise is truely representative of what happened. Genious to some is ignorance to others (lol).
Thanks for the ping.