[BfloGuy]

This reader not keen on Schlafly.

[pissant]

Considering she scuttled Fred Thompson’s mentor’s plan for the Equal Rights Amendment, I give her some credit.

[JillValentine]

Schlafly doesn’t seem to realize that the mercantilist beliefs she worships like a religion were disproved by Adam Smith over 200 years ago.

[Strategerist]

This reader not keen on Schlafly.

It's generally very rare for her to actually have any idea of what she's talking about.

[Eccl 10:2]

On the one hand, she wants a social Conservative who appeals to values-voters, and on the other, one who appeals to job-concerned Reagan Democrats.

That’s a very broad spectrum. And, I’ll get clobbered for saying it, but Reagan didn’t quite walk the talk on social issues - looked who he nominated to the Supreme Court (Scalia - good; Kennedy and O’Connor - much less so).

Also, it’s primary season - candidates are trying to appeal to the base. That’s not where the Reagan Democrats live, by definition.

[ken21]

indeed,

many seem to be helping hillary.

it’s like lemmings dropping off into the sea.

[MHT]

Her day has come, and gone. In real life, she's a petty, self-impressed, pedantic power-seeker. Instead of thinking of the long-term good of the country, by not being a good team player, she (among others of her ilk) is handing the election to Hillary on a silver platter.

I used to think that the Democrats had a monopoly on arrogance and elitism. I can now thank the the "moral" leaders of our party for showing themselves as the self-righteous political rubes that they are.

I'll remember them with in my prayers as I pay higher taxes (oops, "contributions") and wait for my turn in the Hillarycare clinic.

[antisocial]

“This reader not keen on Schlafly.”

Not much of a conservative huh?