“Perhaps you don’t mind low level theft or fraud, many of us do feel that it is wrong at any level and that Rooty exudes that sort of “untouchable” attitude that breeds criminal activity.
Excuse it if you want to, I don’t. It’s too clintonesque.”
Again, you are making assumptions incorrectly based on your prejudice. I didn’t state that I don’t mind low level theft or fraud but merely cite it based on the citations listed as below the level of importance to attach to the Executive.
Do you attach every petty act of “low level theft or fraud” to the Executive of your State, similar in scope to the size of the NYC budget?
If you wish to make that “connection” why not tie it to the US federal executive? With that kind of logic President Bush is responsible for all corruption including where local governments have taxpayer funded luncheons.
Again, I would suggest that an attack on Rudy be based on his record and his positions with the key being HIS, not the actions of other petty government officials.
Spare us the reference to the Clintons to who deserves it: the Clintons.
And you keep pushing these criminals off as low level petty workers instead of those with close ties to Rudi. It shows a lack of judgement on his part and deserves a connection to the clintons.